...
首页> 外文期刊>Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia >Comparison between two methods for cardiac output measurement in propofol-anesthetized dogs: thermodilution and Doppler.
【24h】

Comparison between two methods for cardiac output measurement in propofol-anesthetized dogs: thermodilution and Doppler.

机译:异丙酚麻醉犬两种心输出量测量方法的比较:热稀释法和多普勒法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective: To compare cardiac output (CO) measured by Doppler echocardiography and thermodilution techniques in spontaneously breathing dogs during continuous infusion of propofol. To do so, CO was obtained using the thermodilution method (COTD) and Doppler evaluation of pulmonary flow (CODP) and aortic flow (CODA). Study design: Prospective cohort study. Animals: Eight adult dogs weighing 8.3+or-2.0 kg. Methods: Propofol was used for induction (7.5+or-1.9 mg kg-1 IV) followed by a continuous rate infusion at 0.7 mg kg-1 minute-1. The animals were positioned in left lateral recumbency on an echocardiography table that allowed for positioning of the transducer at the 3rd and 5th intercostal spaces of the left hemithorax for Doppler evaluation of pulmonary and aortic valves, respectively. CODP and CODA were calculated from pulmonary and aortic velocity spectra, respectively. A pulmonary artery catheter was inserted via the jugular vein and positioned inside the lumen of the pulmonary artery in order to evaluate COTD. The first measurement of COTD, CODP and CODA was performed 30 minutes after beginning continuous infusion (T0) and then at 15-minute intervals (T15, T30, T45 and T60). Numeric data were submitted to two-way ANOVA for repeated measurements, Pearson's correlation coefficient and Bland & Altman analysis. Data are presented as mean+or-SD. Results: At T0, COTD was lower than CODA. CODA was higher than COTD and CODP at T30, T45 and T60. The difference between the COTD and CODP, when all data were included, was -0.04+or-0.22 L minute-1 and Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) was 0.86. The difference between the COTD and CODA was -0.87+or-0.54 L minute-1 and r=0.69. For COTD and CODP, the difference was -0.82+or-0.59 L minute-1 and r=0.61. Conclusion: Doppler evaluation of pulmonary flow was a clinically acceptable method for assessing the CO in propofol-anesthetized dogs.
机译:目的:比较多普勒超声心动图和热稀释技术在连续输注异丙酚期间自发呼吸的狗的心输出量(CO)。为此,使用热稀释法(CO TD )和多普勒评估肺血流(CO DP )和主动脉血流(CO DA )。研究设计:前瞻性队列研究。动物:八只成年犬,体重8.3 +-2.0公斤。方法:丙泊酚用于诱导(7.5+或-1.9 mg kg -1 IV),然后以0.7 mg kg -1 min - 1 。将动物放置在超声心动图上的左侧卧位,以允许将换能器定位在左半胸腔的第3和第5肋间空间,分别用于肺和主动脉瓣的多普勒评估。从肺和主动脉速度谱分别计算出CO DP 和CO DA 。经由颈静脉插入肺动脉导管并将其放置在肺动脉腔内以评估CO TD 。在开始连续输注(T0)30分钟后,然后在15分钟后,首次测量CO TD ,CO DP 和CO DA 间隔(T15,T30,T45和T60)。将数值数据提交给双向ANOVA以进行重复测量,Pearson相关系数和Bland&Altman分析。数据表示为平均值±SD。结果:在T0时,CO TD 低于CO DA 。在T30,T45和T60,CO DA 高于CO TD 和CO DP 。包括所有数据时,CO TD 和CO DP 之间的差异为-0.04+或-0.22 L分钟 -1 和皮尔森氏相关系数( r )为0.86。 CO TD 和CO DA 之间的差异为-0.87+或-0.54 L分钟 -1 和 r = 0.69。对于CO TD 和CO DP ,差异为-0.82+或-0.59 L分钟 -1 和 r = 0.61。结论:多普勒评估肺血流量是评估丙泊酚麻醉犬CO的临床可接受方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号