首页> 外文期刊>Value in health: the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research >Estimating preference-based single index measures for dementia using DEMQOL and DEMQOL-proxy
【24h】

Estimating preference-based single index measures for dementia using DEMQOL and DEMQOL-proxy

机译:使用DEMQOL和DEMQOL-proxy评估痴呆症的基于偏好的单一指数测量

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: Although condition-specific measures are commonly used in dementia, they cannot be used in analyses of cost per quality-adjusted life-year because they do not incorporate preferences. We addressed this gap by estimating two preference-based single index measures: the DEMQOL-U from the self-report DEMQOL (mild-to-moderate dementia severity) and the DEMQOL-Proxy-U from the carer-report DEMQOL-Proxy (all levels of dementia severity). Methods: We conducted valuation studies on 593 members of the general population (306 for the DEMQOL-U, 287 for the DEMQOL-Proxy-U) using the time trade-off elicitation technique. We then fitted a range of mean and individual-level multivariate regression models to the valuation data to derive preference weights for each measure. We applied the estimated weights to a large, clinically representative sample. Results: Mean observed time trade-off values ranged from 0.18 to 0.95 for DEMQOL-U and from 0.33 to 0.96 for DEMQOL-Proxy-U. The best performing models for each measure were main effects models estimated using individual-level data. DEMQOL-Proxy-U had inconsistent but insignificant coefficient estimates for one dimension. Models were estimated to remove these inconsistencies. Conclusion: Preference-based single index measures from DEMQOL and DEMQOL-Proxy for use in economic evaluation will enable economic evaluation using quality-adjusted life-years to be undertaken for people across the full range of dementia severity. Future research will examine how the utilities from each measure can be used and combined to populate cost-effectiveness models.
机译:目的:尽管针对特定状况的措施通常用于痴呆症,但由于它们未考虑偏好,因此不能用于分析每质量调整生命年的成本。我们通过估计两种基于首选项的单一指标衡量指标来解决这一差距:从自我报告的DEMQOL(轻度至中度痴呆严重程度)得出的DEMQOL-U和在照顾者报告的DEMQOL-Proxy中得出的DEMQOL-Proxy-U(全部痴呆严重程度的水平)。方法:我们使用时间权衡启发技术对593个普通人群(DEMQOL-U为306个,DEMQOL-Proxy-U为287个)进行了评估研究。然后,我们将一系列均值和个人水平的多元回归模型拟合到评估数据中,以得出每种度量的偏好权重。我们将估计的权重应用于一个大型的,具有临床代表性的样本。结果:对于DEMQOL-U,观察到的平均时间折衷值在0.18到0.95之间;对于DEMQOL-Proxy-U,观察到的平均时间折中值在0.33到0.96之间。每种措施中效果最好的模型是使用个体水平数据估算的主要效应模型。 DEMQOL-Proxy-U对一维的系数估计不一致但不重要。估计模型可以消除这些不一致之处。结论:来自DEMQOL和DEMQOL-Proxy的基于偏好的单一指数测量用于经济评估,将使质量痴呆症严重程度范围内的人们能够使用经过质量调整的生命年进行经济评估。未来的研究将研究如何使用每种度量的效用并将其组合以构成成本效益模型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号