...
首页> 外文期刊>Tumour biology : >Comment on Jiang G. et al.: Efficacy and safety between temozolomide alone and temozolomide-based double therapy for malignant melanoma: A meta-analysis
【24h】

Comment on Jiang G. et al.: Efficacy and safety between temozolomide alone and temozolomide-based double therapy for malignant melanoma: A meta-analysis

机译:评姜江等:替莫唑胺与基于替莫唑胺的双重治疗恶性黑色素瘤的疗效和安全性:一项荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Dear Editor, We read with great interest the recent paper by Jiang G. et al., "Efficacy and safety between temozolomide alone and temozolomide-based double therapy for malignant melanoma: a meta-analysis," published online in Tumor Biology [1]. The investigators performed a meta-analysis of five randomized controlled trials to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of temozolomide (TMZ) alone and TMZ-based combination drug therapy in patients with melanoma. It is a very interesting study. Nevertheless, we have several queries which we would like to communicate with the investigators.
机译:亲爱的编辑,我们非常感兴趣,阅读了Jiang G等人最近发表的论文:“单独使用替莫唑胺与基于替莫唑胺的双重疗法治疗恶性黑色素瘤的疗效和安全性:一项荟萃分析”,在线发表在《肿瘤生物学》上[1] 。研究人员对5个随机对照试验进行了荟萃分析,比较了替莫唑胺(TMZ)和基于TMZ的联合药物治疗黑色素瘤患者的临床疗效和安全性。这是一个非常有趣的研究。尽管如此,我们还是有几个疑问想与研究者沟通。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号