...
首页> 外文期刊>Tumour biology : >A retrospective analysis of efficacy and safety of adding bevacizumab to chemotherapy as first- and second-line therapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
【24h】

A retrospective analysis of efficacy and safety of adding bevacizumab to chemotherapy as first- and second-line therapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

机译:对贝伐单抗联合化疗作为晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)一线和二线治疗的有效性和安全性的回顾性分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Several phase III clinical trials had authenticated that the addition of bevacizumab to paclitaxel plus carboplatin or gemcitabine plus cisplatin showed encouraging efficacy as first-line therapy for advanced NSCLC patients. However, the benefits of adding bevacizumab to other chemotherapy regimens in first- or second-line therapy have not been reported. To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of bevacizumab concomitant with chemotherapy regimens in patients with advanced NSCLC as first- or second-line therapy, we retrospectively reviewed the effects of adding bevacizumab to chemotherapy regimens in naive-chemotherapy and pre-chemotherapy patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC. A total of 79 patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC received at least two cycles of bevacizumab with chemotherapy between October 2010 and December 2013 were selected. Our primary end points were overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). The secondary objective was overall survival (OS) and safety. Seventy-nine patients were included in this study. Overall response rates at first evaluation (after 2 cycles) were 23.1 % (9/39) and 5.0 % (2/40) in first- and second-line therapy (P = 0.020), respectively. And disease control rates were 84.6 % (33/39) and 50 % (20/40), respectively (P = 0.001). The median OS were 27.2 months (95 % CI 13.3-41.1 months) and 29.6 months (95 % CI 6.7-52.5 months), respectively (P = 0.740). Grade 3-4 adverse events included leukopenia (2/39), and neutropenia (3/39) in first-line therapy versus neutropenia (1/40) and thrombocytopenia (2/40) in second-line treatment. In our experience, combination of bevacizumab and chemotherapy had encouraging anti-tumor efficacy as both first- and second-line therapy.
机译:多项III期临床试验已证实,在紫杉醇加卡铂或吉西他滨加顺铂中加入贝伐单抗显示出令人鼓舞的疗效,成为晚期NSCLC患者的一线治疗药物。但是,尚未报道在一线或二线治疗中将贝伐单抗添加到其他化疗方案中的益处。为了比较贝伐单抗联合化疗方案作为一线或二线晚期晚期NSCLC患者的临床疗效和安全性,我们回顾性研究了将贝伐单抗与化疗方案联合用于单纯性化疗和化疗前晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的疗效。鳞状非小细胞肺癌。选择2010年10月至2013年12月期间接受化疗至少两次贝伐珠单抗治疗的79例晚期非鳞状NSCLC患者。我们的主要终点是总体缓解率(ORR)和疾病控制率(DCR)。次要目标是总体生存(OS)和安全性。该研究包括79名患者。一线和二线治疗的首次评估(2个周期后)的总缓解率分别为23.1%(9/39)和5.0%(2/40)(P = 0.020)。疾病控制率分别为84.6%(33/39)和50%(20/40)(P = 0.001)。中位OS分别为27.2个月(95%CI 13.3-41.1个月)和29.6个月(95%CI 6.7-52.5个月)(P = 0.740)。 3-4级不良事件包括一线治疗中的白细胞减少症(2/39)和中性白细胞减少症(3/39),二线治疗中的中性粒细胞减少症(1/40)和血小板减少症(2/40)。根据我们的经验,贝伐单抗和化学疗法的结合作为一线和二线治疗均具有令人鼓舞的抗肿瘤功效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号