...
首页> 外文期刊>Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences >The effects of different silage additives on the quality of sugar beet pulp silage
【24h】

The effects of different silage additives on the quality of sugar beet pulp silage

机译:不同青贮添加剂对甜菜粕青贮品质的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this study, the effect of different silage additive added during ensiling period was investigated on the silages quality and determination of storage characters of sugar beet pulp. Treatment groups consisted of silage additives. These groups were K group no additives, F group with 5 percent formic acid, P group with 8 percent whole crop barley after wilting silage, M group with 8 percent corn silage and S group with whole crop barley added straw with treated HCI silage. The changes in nutrients contents, fermentation products, in vitro digestibility of dry matter, counts of mold and aerob bacteria of silage after silos opened and fresh material on days 0, 7, 14, 21, 28 and 36 were determined. Dry matter, crude protein, ether extract and crude fiber levels increased in silage groups as compared with fresh materials. However, nitrogen free extract contents decreased. Dry matter and nitrogen free extract contents were not different in treatment groups, but, the lowest values were determined in K group (p<0.05). The lowest pH was detected in F group, this group followed by S, P, M and K groups (p<0.01). Lactic acid concentration was high in M group but, lowest value was in F group (p<0.01). The highest acetic acid and ammonia -N were in K group. The differences were significant between K and treatment groups. While, butyric acid was detected in K group, but not in treatment groups. The in vitro digestibility of dry matter in silage was 61.12, 64.65, 63.89, 64.00 and 63.00 percent in K, F, P, M and S groups, respectively (p<0.05). The highest counts of mold and aerob bacteria of sugar beet pulp and silage after silos opened on days 0, 7, 14, 21, 28 and 36 were in sugar beet pulp, this material followed by K and treatment groups. On the other hand, mold and aerob bacteria were not isolated in treatment groups after silos opened (O d). The differences were significant between K and treatment groups.
机译:在这项研究中,研究了在青贮期间添加不同青贮饲料添加剂对青贮饲料质量和甜菜果肉贮藏特性的影响。治疗组由青贮饲料添加剂组成。这些组是:无添加剂的K组,有5%甲酸的F组,有青贮饲料的P组有8%的全麦大麦,有8%玉米青贮的M组和有全麦大麦的S组加了经过HCI青贮处理的秸秆。在第0、7、14、21、28和36天,测定了筒仓打开后和新鲜原料中的营养成分,发酵产物,干物质的体外消化率,青贮饲料中霉菌和青贮细菌的变化。与新鲜原料相比,青贮饲料组中的干物质,粗蛋白,醚提取物和粗纤维含量增加。但是,无氮提取物含量下降。处理组干物质和无氮提取物含量无差异,但在K组中最低(p <0.05)。 F组中最低的是pH,S,P,M和K组最低(p <0.01)。 M组乳酸浓度高,而F组最低(p <0.01)。 K组中乙酸和氨氮最高。 K组和治疗组之间的差异是显着的。而在K组中检出了丁酸,但在治疗组中未检出。 K,F,P,M和S组青贮饲料中干物质的体外消化率分别为61.12%,64.65%,63.89%,64.00和63.00%(p <0.05)。在第0、7、14、21、28和36天打开筒仓后,甜菜果肉和青贮饲料中霉菌和需氧菌的最高计数在甜菜果肉中,其次是钾和处理组。另一方面,在筒仓打开后,未在治疗组中分离出霉菌和需氧细菌(O d)。 K组和治疗组之间的差异是显着的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号