...
首页> 外文期刊>Transfusion: The Journal of the American Association of Blood Banks >A multi-laboratory evaluation of in vitro platelet assays: the tests for extent of shape change and response to hypotonic shock. Biomedical Excellence for Safer Transfusion Working Party of the International Society of Blood Transfusion.
【24h】

A multi-laboratory evaluation of in vitro platelet assays: the tests for extent of shape change and response to hypotonic shock. Biomedical Excellence for Safer Transfusion Working Party of the International Society of Blood Transfusion.

机译:体外血小板测定的多实验室评估:形状变化程度和对低渗性休克反应的测试。国际输血协会“更安全的生物医学卓越奖”工作组。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus regarding the use of specific in vitro tests for the assessment of the quality of platelet components. A literature review found that the platelet discoid shape as measured photometrically by the extent of shape change (ESC) and hypotonic shock response (HSR) correlated well with in vivo viability. The purpose of this study was to determine whether multiple research laboratories can perform the ESC and HSR assays in an accurate, reproducible manner, with acceptable sensitivity and comparable results. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Eleven laboratories conducted five identical experiments, each with a different unit of platelet-rich plasma (PRP). For each experiment, 2 half-units of PRP were prepared and stored overnight: 1 half-unit at 20 to 24 degrees C in CPD (CPD-PRP) and the other at 1 to 6 degrees C with 2 mg per mL of EDTA (cold EDTA-PRP) added to produce spherical platelets with reduced HSR. Platelet suspensions having different proportions of the two PRPs were prepared and evaluated in duplicate by ESC and HSR assays, and morphologically scored by microscopy. One-way ANOVA and Duncan multiple-range tests were performed to determine significant differences in assay results for suspensions having different proportions of CPD-PRP. RESULTS: Comparable ESC (mean range: 20-28% for CPD-PRP and 1-6% for cold EDTA-PRP) and HSR (mean range: 58-81% for CPD-PRP and 12-31% for cold EDTA-PRP) measurements were obtained by nine laboratories. Duplicate testing showed high reproducibility of ESR and HSR results /in all laboratories. A 25-percent difference in the proportion of CPD-PRP (indicative of a difference of approximately 25% in the proportions of discoid and spherical platelets) was detected with a sample size of five (p<0.05) for both the ESC and HSR assays. A high correlation was found for the ESC assay and morphology score (r = 0.93, n = 345). CONCLUSION: Multiple laboratories were able to obtain comparable results with the ESC and HSR tests. They were able to show that the tests can be performed in an accurate, reproducible manner and with acceptable sensitivity.
机译:背景:关于使用特定的体外测试评估血小板成分质量尚无共识。文献综述发现,通过光度学测定的血小板盘状形状(ESC)和低渗性休克反应(HSR)与体内生存能力密切相关。这项研究的目的是确定多个研究实验室是否可以准确,可重复的方式进行ESC和HSR分析,并具有可接受的灵敏度和可比较的结果。研究设计和方法:11个实验室进行了5个相同的实验,每个实验使用不同单位的富血小板血浆(PRP)。对于每个实验,制备2个半单位的PRP并储存过夜:1个半单位的CPD(CPD-PRP)在20至24摄氏度下,另一个在1至6摄氏度下每毫升EDTA含2 mg(加入冷乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA-PRP)以产生具有降低的HSR的球形血小板。制备具有不同比例的两种PRP的血小板悬液,并通过ESC和HSR分析一式两份进行评估,并通过显微镜进行形态学评分。进行了单向方差分析和Duncan多范围测试,以确定CPD-PRP比例不同的悬浮液的测定结果存在显着差异。结果:可比的ESC(平均范围:CPD-PRP为20-28%,冷EDTA-PRP为1-6%)和HSR(平均范围:CPD-PRP为58-81%,冷EDTA-为12-31% PRP)测量是由9个实验室获得的。重复测试表明,在所有实验室中,ESR和HSR结果的再现性都很高。在ESC和HSR分析中,样本量为5(p <0.05)时,检测到CPD-PRP的比例相差25%(表明盘状和球形血小板的比例相差约25%)。 。发现与ESC分析和形态学评分高度相关(r = 0.93,n = 345)。结论:多个实验室能够通过ESC和HSR测试获得可比的结果。他们能够证明测试可以准确,可重复的方式进行并且具有可接受的灵敏度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号