...
首页> 外文期刊>Traffic Injury Prevention >An Overview of Frontal Air Bag Performance with Changes in Frontal Crash-Test Requirements: Findings of the Blue Ribbon Panel for the Evaluation of Advanced Technology Air Bags
【24h】

An Overview of Frontal Air Bag Performance with Changes in Frontal Crash-Test Requirements: Findings of the Blue Ribbon Panel for the Evaluation of Advanced Technology Air Bags

机译:正面碰撞测试要求有所变化的正面安全气囊性能概述:用于评估先进技术安全气囊的蓝带面板的发现

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective. In the mid-1990s, evidence emerged that air bag deployments could result in deaths to vulnerable vehicle occupants who were very close to air bag modules when they deployed. In 1997, federal frontal crash test requirements were modified to allow crash testing with unbelted dummies to be performed using sled tests. As a result, vehicle manufacturers were able to redesign air bags to deploy with less force and energy, thereby reducing the toll of air bag-induced deaths. However, there was concern that depowered air bags may not provide the same level of protection to unbelted occupants in severe frontal crashes, particularly occupants of large stature and body mass. This paper provides a summary of recent studies addressing this issue. Methods. To expedite the accrual of data regarding air bag performance, the collection of additional crash data was funded by the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers. A panel of experts was commissioned to oversee the process and evaluate the data. During the past 6 years, a series of studies has been undertaken by panel members and others to evaluate the performance of redesigned air bags and the data are summarized here. Results and Conclusions. There is now convincing evidence that the combination of air bag redesign and public education have resulted in dramatic reductions in air bag-induced infant and child deaths. In addition, the frontal crash fatality risks among children sitting in front seats have been reduced by as much as half, with younger children showing the greatest benefits. Among adult drivers and right-front passengers, there is no evidence for the predicted overall loss of protection with sled-certified air bags and there are far fewer air bag-induced deaths among this population. However, despite exhaustive analyses of frontal-crash data, the possibility of a somewhat elevated fatality risk among a subset of unbelted drivers in sled-certified 1998-1999 model vehicles cannot be ruled out. There also is some evidence that the risks of serious chest injury may be higher among unbelted drivers in frontal crashes in sled-certified vehicles with redesigned air bags. Further research is warranted to determine whether these differences remain in newer model vehicles designed to the advanced air bag rule, which took effect in 2003.
机译:目的。在1990年代中期,有证据表明,安全气囊的展开可能导致脆弱的乘员死亡,这些乘员在展开时非常接近安全气囊模块。 1997年,对联邦正面碰撞测试的要求进行了修改,以允许使用雪橇测试对未系安全带的假人进行碰撞测试。结果,汽车制造商能够重新设计安全气囊,使其以更少的力和能量展开,从而减少了安全气囊导致的死亡人数。然而,令人担忧的是,在严重的正面碰撞中,断电的安全气囊可能无法为未系安全带的乘员提供相同水平的保护,尤其是身材高大和体重较大的乘员。本文提供了解决该问题的最新研究的摘要。方法。为了加快有关安全气囊性能的数据的累积,其他碰撞数据的收集由汽车制造商联盟资助。委托一个专家小组来监督过程和评估数据。在过去的6年中,小组成员和其他人员进行了一系列研究,以评估重新设计的安全气囊的性能,此处汇总了数据。结果和结论。现在有令人信服的证据表明,重新设计安全气囊和进行公共教育相结合,已大大减少了安全气囊引起的婴儿和儿童死亡。此外,坐在前排座位上的儿童的正面碰撞致死危险已降低了一半,而年幼的儿童则受益最大。在成年驾驶员和右前乘客中,没有证据表明预计使用雪橇认证的安全气囊会导致整体保护功能丧失,并且该人群中安全气囊导致的死亡人数要少得多。然而,尽管对正面碰撞数据进行了详尽的分析,但仍不能排除在经过雪橇认证的1998-1999年模型车辆中,部分未系安全带的驾驶员中导致死亡风险升高的可能性。还有一些证据表明,在安全带重新设计的雪橇认证车辆的正面碰撞中,未系安全带的驾驶员正面撞车的危险可能更高。有必要进行进一步的研究来确定这些差异是否仍然存在于根据高级安全气囊规则设计的新型汽车中,该汽车于2003年生效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号