...
首页> 外文期刊>Traffic Injury Prevention >Analysis of Head Impacts Causing Neck Compression Injury
【24h】

Analysis of Head Impacts Causing Neck Compression Injury

机译:头部撞击导致颈部压缩损伤的分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective. Human cadavers have been subjected to inverted drop, linear, and pendulum impacts to the top of the head, causing neck compression injury. The data are not comparable on the basis of impact velocity because of differing impact masses and test conditions. This study analyzed the published biomechanical data and used peak head velocity to merge the datasets. Correlations were determined between biomechanical responses and serious injury (AIS 3+). Methods. Three studies were found involving 33 inverted drop tests and three others involving 42 linear or pendulum impacts to the top of a cadaver's head. Various biomechanical responses were measured in the tests. The datasets could not be meaningfully merged on the basis of impact velocity. The coefficient of restitution (e) was determined and the peak head velocity calculated for tests with missing data. This allowed the datasets to be merged and statistically analyzed for relationships between head velocity, impact force, and serious injury. Power functions were fit to the biomechanical data, t-tests conducted for significant differences in injury, and logit risk functions determined. Results. The coefficient of restitution was e = 0.24 ± 0.16 (n = 19) for the drop tests and e = 0.21 ± 0.12 (n = 20) for the impact tests. Peak head velocity was 22% higher than the impact velocity for the drop tests but -20% lower in the impact tests. Head velocity averaged 6.32 ± 1.29 m/s (n = 51) causing serious injury and 3.75 ± 2.16 m/s (n = 24) without injury (t = 5.39, p = 0.00001, df = 31). Impact force was 7,382 ± 3,632 N with injury and 3,760 ± 3,528 N without (t = 3.95, p = 0.0003, df = 42). A power function fit the impact force versus head velocity data (F = 374(V{sub} h){sup}1.565, R{sup}2 = 0.758). Conclusion. Peak head velocity was determined for inverted drop and impact tests as a means of merging and analyzing cadaver data on serious injury for impacts to the top of the head. There are relationships between head velocity, impact force, and serious injury. A 15% risk of serious injury is at 2.3 m/s (5.1 mph) head velocity and 50% risk at 4.2 m/s (9.4 mph); however, more data are needed in the 2-4 m/s head velocity range to clarify injury risks. In addition, many factors influence the risk of the neck injury, including the age and physical condition of the person; orientation of the head, neck, and torso; and location of impact and interface.
机译:目的。人类的尸体已经遭受了倒落,线性和摆锤撞击到头部的顶部,导致颈部受压伤。由于冲击质量和测试条件不同,因此基于冲击速度的数据不具有可比性。这项研究分析了已发表的生物力学数据,并使用峰头速度合并了数据集。确定了生物力学反应与严重伤害之间的相关性(AIS 3+)。方法。发现三项研究涉及33个倒落测试,另外三项涉及对尸体头部顶部的42次线性或摆锤冲击。在测试中测量了各种生物力学响应。不能基于碰撞速度有意义地合并数据集。确定恢复系数(e),并为缺少数据的测试计算峰值流速。这样就可以合并数据集并进行统计分析,以分析头部速度,冲击力和严重伤害之间的关系。功效函数适合于生物力学数据,进行了t检验以检测伤害的显着差异,并确定了logit风险函数。结果。跌落试验的恢复系数为e = 0.24±0.16(n = 19),冲击试验的恢复系数为e = 0.21±0.12(n = 20)。最高头部速度比跌落测试的冲击速度高22%,但在冲击测试中降低-20%。头部平均速度为6.32±1.29 m / s(n = 51),造成严重伤害;而头部平均速度为3.75±2.16 m / s(n = 24),无伤害(t = 5.39,p = 0.00001,df = 31)。有冲击力的冲击力为7,382±3,632 N,无冲击力的冲击力为3,760±3,528 N(t = 3.95,p = 0.0003,df = 42)。幂函数拟合冲击力与头部速度数据的关系(F = 374(V {sub} h){sup} 1.565,R {sup} 2 = 0.758)。结论。确定颠倒跌落和撞击测试的最高头部速度,作为合并和分析尸体有关严重伤害头部的数据的手段。头部速度,冲击力和严重伤害之间存在关系。 15%的严重伤害危险是2.3 m / s(5.1 mph)的头部速度,50%的危险危险是4.2 m / s(9.4 mph);但是,需要在2-4 m / s的头部速度范围内获得更多数据,以明确伤害风险。另外,许多因素会影响颈部受伤的风险,包括人的年龄和身体状况。头部,颈部和躯干的方向;以及影响和界面的位置。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号