...
首页> 外文期刊>Traffic Injury Prevention >Safety Evaluation of Joint and Conventional Lane Merge Configurations for Freeway Work Zones
【24h】

Safety Evaluation of Joint and Conventional Lane Merge Configurations for Freeway Work Zones

机译:高速公路工作区联合和常规车道合并配置的安全性评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Inefficient operation of traffic in work zone areas not only leads to an increase in travel time delays, queue length, and fuel consumption but also increases the number of forced merges and roadway accidents. This study evaluated the safety performance of work zones with a conventional lane merge (CLM) configuration in Louisiana. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the crash rates for accidents involving fatalities, injuries, and property damage only (PDO) in each of the following 4 areas: (1) advance warning area, (2) transition area, (3) work area, and (4) termination area. The analysis showed that the advance warning area had higher fatality, injury, and PDO crash rates when compared to the transition area, work area, and termination area. This finding confirmed the need to make improvements in the advance warning area where merging maneuvers take place. Therefore, a new lane merge configuration, called joint lane merge (JLM), was proposed and its safety performance was examined and compared to the conventional lane merge configuration using a microscopic simulation model (VISSIM), which was calibrated with real-world data from an existing work zone on I-55 and used to simulate a total of 25 different scenarios with different levels of demand and traffic composition. Safety performance was evaluated using 2 surrogate measures: uncomfortable decelerations and speed variance. Statistical analysis was conducted to determine whether the differences in safety performance between both configurations were significant. The safety analysis indicated that JLM outperformed CLM in most cases with low to moderate flow rates and that the percentage of trucks did not have a significant impact on the safety performance of either configuration. Though the safety analysis did not clearly indicate which lane merge configuration is safer for the overall work zone area, it was able to identify the possibly associated safety changes within the work zone area under different traffic conditions.
机译:工作区区域的交通效率低下,不仅会导致旅行时间延迟,排队时间和燃油消耗增加,还会增加强制合并和道路交通事故的数量。这项研究评估了路易斯安那州采用常规车道合并(CLM)配置的工作区的安全性能。方差分析(ANOVA)用于比较以下4个区域中每一个涉及死亡,伤害和仅财产损失(PDO)的事故的崩溃率:(1)预警区域,(2)过渡区域,(3 )工作区,以及(4)终止区。分析表明,与过渡区域,工作区域和终止区域相比,预警区域具有更高的死亡率,伤害和PDO坠毁率。这一发现证实了需要对发生合并动作的预警区域进行改进。因此,提出了一种新的车道合并配置,称为联合车道合并(JLM),并对其安全性能进行了检查,并将其与使用微观仿真模型(VISSIM)的常规车道合并配置进行了比较,该模型已使用来自真实世界的数据进行了校准I-55上的现有工作区,用于模拟总共25种不同的场景,这些场景具有不同的需求和流量组成。使用2种替代措施评估安全性能:不舒适的减速和速度变化。进行统计分析以确定两种配置之间的安全性能差异是否显着。安全分析表明,在大多数情况下,JLM的性能要优于CLM,而卡车的百分比对这两种配置的安全性能都没有重大影响。尽管安全分析并未明确指出哪种车道合并配置对整个工作区区域更安全,但它能够识别出在不同交通状况下工作区区域内可能相关的安全变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号