...
首页> 外文期刊>Transactions of the ASABE >Swine manure rate, timing, and application method effects on post-harvest soil nutrients, crop yield, and potential water quality implications in a corn-soybean rotation.
【24h】

Swine manure rate, timing, and application method effects on post-harvest soil nutrients, crop yield, and potential water quality implications in a corn-soybean rotation.

机译:猪粪的施用速度,时间和施用方法对玉米-大豆轮作中收获后土壤养分,作物产量和潜在水质的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The results from a six-year (1996-2001) central Iowa field study that evaluated the effects of swine manure application management practices on soil nutrients, organic matter, pH, crop yield, and discussions on potential water quality implications are documented. Swine manure management practices included single-rate (SR) and double-rate (DR) nitrogen (N) based application rates (168 and 336 N kg/ha, respectively), three timings (fall injection [FI], winter broadcast [WB], and spring injection [SI]), and two methods (broadcast and injection) of liquid swine manure. The analysis of these practices involved comparing levels of residual soil total phosphorus (P) as Bray-1 available P (RSP), residual soil nitrate-nitrogen (RSN), % organic matter (OM%), pH, carbon:nitrogen (C:N) ratio, and crop yields (kg/ha) in a corn-soybean rotation cropping practice. Soil samples were collected immediately prior to commencing the study and after harvest each year and analyzed for RSP, RSN, OM%, pH, and C:N ratio at selected depths in the top 0.30 m of the soil profile. Deep soil core (0-1.22 m) samples also were collected after harvest in 1996 and 2000 and analyzed for RSN as a function of depth in the soil profile. DR application plots had significantly higher accumulation of RSP and RSN (32.6 and 36.5%, respectively) versus SR application plots in the top 0.30 m of the soil profile. The RSP for the SI (38.2%) and WB (32.8%) treatments was significantly higher than for the FI treatment on corn plots. The RSN accumulation was also found to be significantly higher for the SI (33.4%) and WB (17.4%) treatments than for the FI treatment on corn plots. The 0-1.22 m deep soil core analysis indicated a higher RSN accumulation in up to 88% of the 1.22 m soil profile depth range for the DR and SI treatments. When averaged across the six years and application rates, corn yield was significantly higher for SI plots (9,596 kg/ha) versus FI plots (9,236 kg/ha). The reduction in FI plot corn yield results may have been due largely to excessive leaching of nutrients through the soil profile from post-harvest rainfall during the fall-spring duration. Swine manure SI plots with the higher DR application rate produced the highest average corn yield (10,093 kg/ha). When averaged over project years and application times, the SI treatment showed an increase of 4.0% in corn yield over the FI treatment. While there were short-term significant increases in OM% for the SI1 treatment during 1996 and 1997, there were no significant cumulative differences in OM% as well as pH and C:N ratio in the soil profile after six years of N management. Although no manure was applied to soybean plots, residual effects of N management practices using the WB and SI application methods in the DR treatment plots during corn years significantly increased average values of RSP, RSN, and soybean yield. Long-term application of higher liquid swine manure rates during winter and spring application times resulted in significantly higher post-harvest accumulation of residual P and N in the soil. The incorporation of swine manure during spring application produced significantly higher corn yields compared with fall and winter application times. Overall results suggest that while residual soil P and N content may be significantly higher from spring versus fall manure application times, these nutrient runoff losses and the potential threat to surface water quality may be substantially lower during spring and summer compared with fall and winter due to effects from crop nutrient uptake, microbial activity, leaching, and evapotranspiration during the growing season.
机译:记录了爱荷华州一项为期六年(1996-2001)的田间研究的结果,该研究评估了猪粪施用管理实践对土壤养分,有机质,pH,作物产量的影响,并讨论了对水质的潜在影响。猪粪管理实践包括单次施用(SR)和双重施用(DR)氮(N)施用量(分别为168和336 N kg / ha),三个时间点(秋季注入[FI],冬季广播[WB] ]和春季注射[SI]),以及液态猪粪的两种方法(广播和注射)。这些实践的分析涉及比较土壤剩余总磷(P)(以Bray-1有效磷(RSP)),土壤残余硝态氮(RSN),有机质%(OM%),pH,碳:氮(C :N)比,以及玉米-大豆轮作实践中的农作物产量(kg / ha)。在开始研究之前和每年收获之后立即收集土壤样品,并在土壤剖面顶部0.30 m的选定深度处分析RSP,RSN,OM%,pH和C:N比。在1996年和2000年收获后还收集了深层土壤核心(0-1.22 m)样品,并根据土壤剖面深度对RSN进行了分析。在土壤剖面的顶部0.30 m处,DR施用地块的RSP和RSN积聚明显高于SR施用地块(分别为32.6和36.5%)。在玉米田中,SI(38.2%)和WB(32.8%)处理的RSP显着高于FI处理。在玉米田中,SI处理(33.4%)和WB处理(17.4%)的RSN积累也显着高于FI处理。 0-1.22 m的深层土壤核心分析表明,对于DR和SI处理,在1.22 m的土壤剖面深度范围内,高达88%的更高的RSN积累。如果将这六年的平均水平和施用量平均,SI地块(9,596 kg / ha)的玉米产量要高于FI地块(9,236 kg / ha)的玉米产量。 FI地块玉米单产结果的减少可能主要是由于秋春季持续降雨后收获后降雨过土壤中的养分过分浸出。 DR施用率较高的猪粪SI地块的最高玉米平均产量(10,093 kg / ha)。当按项目年限和施用时间平均时,SI处理比FI处理的玉米产量增加了4.0%。虽然在1996年至1997年间,SI1处理的OM%出现短期显着增加,但在施氮6年后,土壤剖面中OM%以及pH和C:N比的累积累积差异均无显着性。尽管没有将肥料施用到大豆田,但在玉米年期间,在DR处理田中使用WB和SI施用方法的氮肥管理措施的残留效应显着提高了RSP,RSN和大豆产量的平均值。在冬季和春季施用期间长期施用较高的液态猪粪肥量,会导致收获后土壤中残留的P和N明显增加。与秋季和冬季的施用时间相比,春季施用的猪粪肥能显着提高玉米产量。总体结果表明,虽然春季和秋季施用肥料后的剩余土壤P和N含量可能显着较高,但春季和夏季相比,由于秋季和冬季,这些养分径流损失和对地表水水质的潜在威胁可能大大降低。生长季节中作物养分吸收,微生物活性,淋溶和蒸散作用的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号