...
首页> 外文期刊>Theriogenology >Cryopreservation of rabbit semen: Comparing the effects of different cryoprotectants, cryoprotectant-free vitrification, and the use of albumin plus osmoprotectants on sperm survival and fertility after standard vapor freezing and vitrification
【24h】

Cryopreservation of rabbit semen: Comparing the effects of different cryoprotectants, cryoprotectant-free vitrification, and the use of albumin plus osmoprotectants on sperm survival and fertility after standard vapor freezing and vitrification

机译:冷冻兔精液:比较不同冷冻保护剂,无冷冻保护剂玻璃化以及使用白蛋白加渗透保护剂对标准蒸气冷冻和玻璃化后精子存活和生育力的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study was designed to improve current freezing protocols for rabbit sperm by examining: (1) the toxicity of different permeable cryoprotectants (CPAs) used for standard vapor freezing (conventional freezing); (2) the feasibility of ultrarapid nonequilibrium freezing (vitrification) of sperm in the absence of permeating CPAs; and (3), the addition of bovine serum albumin (BSA), alone or with sucrose or trehalose as osmoprotectants. First, we evaluated the effects on sperm motility of the incubation time (5 to 60 minutes) with different final concentrations (5% to 20%) of glycerol, N-N-dimethylacetamide, dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), ethylene glycol, propylene glycol, and methanol. N-N-dimethylacetamide (5%) and DMSO (5% and 10%) showed the least toxic effects; the use of 10% DMSO producing the best postthaw sperm motility and membrane integrity results (P < 0.05) after conventional freezing. For vitrification, semen was diluted in the absence of permeable CPAs and frozen by dropping semen directly in liquid nitrogen. However, this led to the low or null cryosurvival of sperm postvitrification (0.16 +/- 0.4%, 1.8 +/- 1.6%, and 94.5 +/- 1.4% of motile, membrane-, and DNA-intact sperm cells, respectively). To assess the effects of albumin and osmoprotectants on sperm cryosurvival, sperm was conventionally frozen with 10% DMSO or vitrified in the absence of permeable CPAs without or with 0.5% BSA alone or combined with sucrose or trehalose (range, 0-0.25 M). In the conventional freezing procedure, the addition of BSA alone failed to improve sperm cryosurvival, however, in the presence of BSA plus either sucrose or trehalose, the postthaw motility (using 0.1 M sucrose or trehalose) and DNA integrity (using all additive concentrations) of sperm were significantly better (P < 0.05) than control. Higher numbers of motile and membrane-intact cells were observed when semen was vitrified with BSA alone or with BSA and sucrose (0.1 and 0.25 M) or BSA and trehalose (0.25 M) and a best recovery of DNA-intact sperm was recorded for BSA plus sucrose compared with semen vitrified without osmoprotectants (P < 0.05). Finally, the cryodiluent combinations BSA/sucrose and BSA/trehalose were compared in an insemination trial. Rabbit does were inseminated with fresh semen (N = 56), semen conventionally cryopreserved in the BSA-based cryodiluents containing 0.1 M sucrose or trehalose (N = 56 per group), or semen vitrified in the presence of 0.25 M sucrose or trehalose (N = 8 per group). Fertility rates and live born kids were similar for semen cryopreserved with BSA/sucrose (77% and 7.6) compared with fresh semen (84% and 8.1) and significantly higher than the figures recorded for the conventionally frozen semen in the BSA/trehalose group (52% and 6.1; P <= 0.05). In contrast, only one doe inseminated with semen vitrified in the presence of BSA/sucrose became pregnant, though no kids were delivered. The conclusions to be drawn from our study are: (1) incubation times and concentration toxicities established for the main permeable CPAs used for conventional freezing of rabbit sperm indicated that DMSO 10% was the least damaging; (2) CPA-free vitrification of rabbit semen led to a low or null sperm cryosurvival; and (3) enriching the freezing medium with BSA plus adequate amounts of sucrose or trehalose can improve the cryosurvival of rabbit sperm after conventional freezing or vitrification. In our working conditions, BSA/sucrose was more effective than BSA/trehalose at preserving the in vivo fertilization capacity of rabbit sperm cryopreserved using the standard procedure. (c) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:这项研究旨在通过检查以下方面来改善当前对兔子精子的冷冻方案:(1)用于标准蒸气冷冻(常规冷冻)的不同渗透性冷冻保护剂(CPA)的毒性; (2)在不存在渗透性CPA的情况下,精子超快非平衡冷冻(玻璃化)的可行性; (3)单独或与蔗糖或海藻糖一起作为渗透保护剂添加牛血清白蛋白(BSA)。首先,我们评估了不同终浓度(5%至20%)的甘油,NN-二甲基乙酰胺,二甲基亚砜(DMSO),乙二醇,丙二醇和甲醇对孵育时间(5至60分钟)对精子活力的影响。 。 N-N-二甲基乙酰胺(5%)和DMSO(5%和10%)的毒性作用最小;常规冷冻后,使用10%DMSO可产生最佳的解冻后精子活力和膜完整性结果(P <0.05)。为了进行玻璃化,将精液在不存在可渗透CPA的情况下稀释,然后将精液直接滴入液氮中进行冷冻。但是,这导致精子玻璃化后冷冻存活率低或为零(分别为运动,膜和DNA完整精子细胞的0.16 +/- 0.4%,1.8 +/- 1.6%和94.5 +/- 1.4%) 。为了评估白蛋白和渗透保护剂对精子冷冻存活的影响,通常将精子用10%DMSO冷冻或在不存在可渗透性CPA的情况下玻璃化,既不单独使用或单独使用0.5%BSA或与蔗糖或海藻糖联合使用(0-0.25 M)。在常规冷冻程序中,单独添加BSA不能提高精子的冷冻存活率,但是,在存在BSA加蔗糖或海藻糖的情况下,解冻后的运动能力(使用0.1 M蔗糖或海藻糖)和DNA完整性(使用所有添加剂浓度)精子数量显着好于对照组(P <0.05)。当单独用BSA或用BSA和蔗糖(0.1和0.25 M)或BSA和海藻糖(0.25 M)对精液进行玻璃化时,观察到更多的能动和膜完整细胞,并且BSA记录了DNA完整精子的最佳回收率加蔗糖与不使用渗透保护剂的玻璃化精液相比(P <0.05)。最后,在人工授精试验中比较了BSA /蔗糖和BSA /海藻糖的冷冻稀释剂组合。用新鲜的精液(N = 56)对兔子的精液进行授精,常规精液在含有0.1 M蔗糖或海藻糖的BSA基冷冻稀释剂中冷冻保存(每组N = 56),或者在0.25 M蔗糖或海藻糖存在的情况下玻璃化精液(N =每组8个)。用BSA /蔗糖冷冻保存的精液的生育率和活产孩子相似(分别为77%和7.6),而新鲜精液(84%和8.1)则显着高于BSA /海藻糖组中常规冷冻精液的记录值( 52%和6.1; P <= 0.05)。相反,在没有BSA /蔗糖的情况下,只有一只用玻璃化精液进行授精的母鹿怀孕了,尽管没有孩子分娩。从我们的研究中得出的结论是:(1)用于常规冷冻兔精子的主要可渗透CPA的孵育时间和浓度毒性表明DMSO 10%的损害最小; (2)兔精液无CPA玻璃化导致精子冷冻存活率低或无效。 (3)在冷冻培养基中添加BSA和适量的蔗糖或海藻糖,可以提高常规冷冻或玻璃化后兔精子的冷冻存活率。在我们的工作条件下,BSA /蔗糖在保持使用标准程序冷冻保存的兔精子的体内受精能力方面比BSA /海藻糖更有效。 (c)2013 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号