...
首页> 外文期刊>The Veterinary Journal >A comparative assessment of culture and serology in the diagnosis of brucellosis in dairy cattle.
【24h】

A comparative assessment of culture and serology in the diagnosis of brucellosis in dairy cattle.

机译:文化和血清学诊断奶牛布鲁氏菌病的比较评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To investigate the usefulness of culture for the confirmation of brucellosis in cattle, a comparison of culture and serology was undertaken on 248 animals in four dairy herds where the disease was active. Paired supramammary (SM), retropharyngeal (RP), and internal iliac (IL) lymph nodes were cultured, and five serological tests were deployed: the microserum agglutination test (MSAT), complement fixation test (CFT), the indirect (iELISA) and competitive ELISA, and the fluorescence polarisation assay (FPA). Brucella abortus was isolated from 86.8% of animals on combined culture of all three lymph nodes. Individually, the highest isolation rate was from the RP (90.5% of culture positives). Of culture positive animals, 13.7% and 6.2% were positive from the RP and SM alone, respectively. Approximately half of the positive cultures yielded <10 colonies/culture plate. Although 80.9% of animals were positive in at least one serological test, only 45.2% were positive in all five. For culture-positive animals, the MSAT was the most sensitive test (71.8%). Of the culture-negative animals 67.7% were positive in at least one test, while 12.9% were positive in all five. Titres were higher in animals culture-positive from the SM, and there was a direct correlation between higher titres and higher colony counts in SM cultures. Only 8.9% of animals were both culture-negative and seropositive (in at least one test), while 16.5% were culture-positive and seronegative in all five tests. The results highlight and validate the sensitivity of bacteriological culture in confirming a diagnosis of bovine brucellosis. While the MSAT and FPA were the most sensitive serological tests, a significant percentage of infected animals were undetectable using these standard serological assays.
机译:为了研究培养物对确认牛布鲁氏菌病的有用性,在该疾病活跃的四个奶牛群中,对248只动物进行了培养物和血清学的比较。培养成对的超血清(SM),咽后(RP)和internal内(IL)淋巴结,并部署了五个血清学测试:微血清凝集测试(MSAT),补体固定测试(CFT),间接(iELISA)和竞争性ELISA和荧光偏振测定(FPA)。在所有三个淋巴结的联合培养中,从86.8%的动物中分离出流产布鲁氏菌。个别而言,最高的分离率来自RP(占培养阳性的90.5%)。在培养阳性动物中,仅RP和SM阳性的动物分别为13.7%和6.2%。大约一半的阳性培养物产生<10个菌落/培养板。尽管至少有一项血清学测试中有80.9%的动物呈阳性,但在所有五项血清学测试中只有45.2%呈阳性。对于培养阳性的动物,MSAT是最敏感的测试(71.8%)。在培养阴性的动物中,至少一项检测为阳性,占67.7%,而全部五种检测均为阳性,为12.9%。在SM培养阳性的动物中,滴度较高,并且在SM培养物中较高的滴度和较高的菌落数之间存在直接相关性。在至少五项测试中,只有8.9%的动物同时具有培养阴性和血清阳性(而至少一项测试),而有16.5%的动物具有培养阳性和血清阴性。结果突出并验证了细菌培养在确认牛布鲁氏菌病诊断中的敏感性。尽管MSAT和FPA是最敏感的血清学检测,但使用这些标准血清学检测法却无法检测到很大比例的感染动物。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号