首页> 外文期刊>The quarterly journal of experimental psychology: QJEP >Individual differences in spatial mental imagery
【24h】

Individual differences in spatial mental imagery

机译:空间心理意象的个体差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In this article, we report a new image-scanning paradigm that allowed us to measure objectively individual differences in spatial mental imagery-specifically, imagery for location. Participants were asked to determine whether an arrow was pointing at a dot using a visual mental image of an array of dots. The degree of precision required to discriminate "yes" from "no" trials was varied. In Experiment 1, the time to scan increasing distances, as well as the number of errors, increased when greater precision was required to make a judgement. The results in Experiment 2 replicated those results while controlling for possible biases. When greater precision is required, the accuracy of the spatial image becomes increasingly important-and hence the effect of precision in the task reflects the accuracy of the image. In Experiment 3, this measure was shown to be related to scores on the Paper Folding test, on the Paper Form Board test, and on the visuospatial items on Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices-but not to scores on questionnaires measuring object-based mental imagery. Thus, we provide evidence that classical standardized spatial tests rely on spatial mental imagery but not object mental imagery.
机译:在本文中,我们报告了一种新的图像扫描范例,该范例使我们能够客观地测量空间心理图像中的个体差异,尤其是位置图像。要求参与者使用点阵列的视觉心理图像来确定箭头是否指向点。区分“是”与“否”的试验所需的精确度有所不同。在实验1中,当需要更高的精度来进行判断时,增加距离扫描的时间以及错误的数量都会增加。实验2中的结果复制了这些结果,同时控制了可能的偏差。当需要更高的精度时,空间图像的精度变得越来越重要-因此任务中精度的影响反映了图像的精度。在实验3中,该度量标准与折纸测试,纸板模板测试以及Raven高级渐进矩阵的视觉空间项目有关,但与测量基于对象的心理意象的问卷调查中的分数无关。因此,我们提供的证据表明,经典的标准化空间测试依赖于空间心理意象而不是对象心理意象。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号