...
首页> 外文期刊>The Prostate >How accurately does prostate biopsy Gleason score predict pathologic findings and disease free survival?
【24h】

How accurately does prostate biopsy Gleason score predict pathologic findings and disease free survival?

机译:前列腺活检格里森评分如何准确地预测病理结果和无病生存期?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: Due to the significant impact on prognosis by subgrouping of prostatectomy Gleason scores < 7, 7, and > 7, we undertook this study to answer whether the biopsy Gleason score was as predictive of disease free survival and assess the correlation with the prostatectomy Gleason score in a modern prostatectomy series. METHODS: An analysis of 1,031 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer was performed. All data was prospectively collected. The Gleason score was categorized into 3 different groups (< 7, 7, and > 7) for biopsy and prostatectomy specimens. Disease free survival was then analyzed for each group. Discrepancies between scores and outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: Accurate correlation was noted in 54.8, 66.8, and 47.4% of Gleason scores < 7, 7, and > 7, respectively. Overall accuracy was 58.3%. Both, biopsy and prostatectomy Gleason score correlated significantly with disease free survival (P = 0.001), furthermore the classification (Gleason scores < 7, 7 and > 7) was highly significant (P = 0.001). Patients with prostatectomy Gleason < 7 tumors had significant survival advantage over those with biopsy Gleason < 7, (P = 0.001). However, disease free survival was superior for patients with biopsy Gleason > 7 than those with prostatectomy Gleason > 7, (P = 0.02). The overall disease free survival was similar among the patients with Gleason score of 7 (P = 0.12). CONCLUSIONS: It appears that biopsy Gleason score, although oftentimes not correlating strongly with the prostatectomy Gleason score, is an important prognostic factor in prostate cancer. There are significant differences in disease free survival between biopsy and prostatectomy Gleason score categories. Copyright 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
机译:目的:由于前列腺切除术的分组对Gleason评分的影响显着,Gleason评分<7、7和> 7,我们进行了这项研究,以回答Gleason活检评分是否可预测无病生存期并评估与前列腺切除术Gleason的相关性在现代前列腺切除术系列中得分较高。方法:对1,031例行根治性前列腺切除术的临床局限性前列腺癌患者进行了分析。所有数据均前瞻性收集。对于活检和前列腺切除术标本,格里森评分分为3个不同的组(<7、7和> 7)。然后分析各组的无病生存期。评估分数和结果之间的差异。结果:准确的相关性分别在Gleason得分<7、7和> 7中分别占54.8、66.8和47.4%。总体准确度为58.3%。活检和前列腺切除术的Gleason评分均与无病生存率显着相关(P = 0.001),此外,分类(Gleason评分<7、7和> 7)非常显着(P = 0.001)。前列腺切除术Gleason <7的患者比活检组织Gleason <7的患者具有显着的生存优势(P = 0.001)。但是,活检组织Gleason> 7的患者的无病生存期优于前列腺切除术Gleason> 7的患者(P = 0.02)。格里森评分为7(P = 0.12)的患者中,总体无病生存率相似。结论:尽管活检的格里森评分通常与前列腺切除术的格里森评分不相关,但似乎是前列腺癌的重要预后因素。活检和前列腺切除术格里森评分类别之间的无病生存率存在显着差异。版权所有2001 Wiley-Liss,Inc.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号