首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Physiology >Republication of The Journal of Physiology (2009) 587, 2855: Expressions of gratitude to The Journal of Physiology, to our colleagues and students, and to the fates that placed us in such a great time to be scientists
【24h】

Republication of The Journal of Physiology (2009) 587, 2855: Expressions of gratitude to The Journal of Physiology, to our colleagues and students, and to the fates that placed us in such a great time to be scientists

机译:《生理学杂志》(2009年)587,2855年的共和国共和国:对《生理学杂志》,我们的同事和学生以及让我们成为科学家的美好时光的命运表示感谢

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Torsten and I obviously feel it an immense honour to be celebrated in this way by The Journal of Physiology. It was there that we published our first papers, in many ways still our farourite ones. We found / Physiol a wonderful place to publish: among other things the figures were beautifully done, the reviews were always fair (i.e. laudatory). Our 1959 paper's submission was accepted by a letter, written we think by William Rushton, that began 'Congratulations upon a very fine paper...', and made no suggestions at all for changes. We were pleased because that paper had gone through 11 drafts and had even passed muster by Ed Furshpan, our fiercest critic. Above all, The Journal didn't follow the bizarre American style of ordering periods and closing quotation marks at ends of sentences. We hated to change journals, but felt forced to because at that time the strictly alphabetical order of authors' names in JP, though perhaps an advantage for me, was hard on Torsten. One could hardly expect Harvard deans or promotion committees to know the ways of the British. The problem came to a climax in the case of Ed Furshpan and Taro Furukawa, who had to change journals so Taro could get promoted in Japan.
机译:托尔斯滕和我显然感到,《生理学杂志》以此方式来庆祝是一项巨大的荣誉。在那儿,我们发表了第一批论文,在许多方面仍然是我们最钟爱的论文。我们发现/ Physiol是发布的绝妙之地:除其他方面的数字做得精美之外,评论总是很公平(即称赞)。我们1959年的论文提交被威廉·拉什顿(William Rushton)认为是一封信所接受,这封信始于“恭喜一篇非常好的论文……”,并且根本没有提出任何修改建议。我们很高兴,因为那篇论文经过了11稿,甚至通过了我们最严格的批评家Ed Furshpan的评审。最重要的是,《华尔街日报》没有遵循怪异的美国式的句号排序和句尾加引号。我们讨厌更改期刊,但感到被迫这么做,因为当时在JP中严格按字母顺序排列作者姓名(虽然对我来说可能是一个优势),但对Torsten来说却很难。很难想到哈佛的院长或晋升委员会会了解英国人的做法。在埃德·弗什潘(Ed Furshpan)和太郎古川(Taro Furukawa)的案例中,问题就达到了高潮,他们不得不更换期刊,以便太郎在日本得到晋升。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号