...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Physiology >Changes in the derived central pressure waveform and pulse pressure in response to angiotensin II and noradrenaline in man.
【24h】

Changes in the derived central pressure waveform and pulse pressure in response to angiotensin II and noradrenaline in man.

机译:人体对血管紧张素II和去甲肾上腺素的反应中得出的中心压力波形和脉压变化。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Peripheral pulse pressure provides a surrogate measure of arterial stiffness. Analysis of the central pressure waveform allows assessment of central pulse pressure and arterial stiffness. The aim of the present study was to assess the effect of vasoconstrictor drugs on pulse pressure amplification and arterial stiffness in vivo. Eight healthy male subjects (mean age 30 years) received an infusion of angiotensin II (1, 3, 6 and 10 ng kg(-1) min(-1)), noradrenaline (10, 30, 60 and 100 ng kg(-1) min(-1)) and matching placebo, in random order, on separate occasions. Peripheral blood pressure and cardiac index were recorded non-invasively. Pulse wave analysis was used to determine augmentation index (AIx), which provides a measure of systemic arterial stiffness, aortic stiffness and central arterial pressure. Infusion of both active drugs resulted in a significant increase in peripheral mean arterial pressure (PMAP), peripheral vascular resistance, AIx, aortic stiffness and central pulse pressure, but only angiotensin II reduced cardiac index. Peripheral pulse pressure was unaffected by infusion of angiotensin II but increased with noradrenaline, which also produced a greater reduction in pulse pressure amplification than angiotensin II. However, the linear relationship of PMAP with both AIx and aortic stiffness did not differ significantly between drugs. These results demonstrate that intravenous infusion of angiotensin II and noradrenaline increase aortic and systemic arterial stiffness. Despite a similar effect on both parameters, for a given change in PMAP, the two drugs had divergent effects on peripheral pulse pressure and pulse pressure amplification. These data reveal that assessment of peripheral pulse pressure does not always reliably predict changes in central pulse pressure or arterial stiffness.
机译:外周脉压提供了动脉僵硬度的替代指标。对中心压力波形的分析可以评估中心脉压和动脉僵硬度。本研究的目的是评估体内血管收缩药对脉压放大和动脉僵硬的作用。 8名健康男性受试者(平均年龄30岁)接受了血管紧张素II(1、3、6和10 ng kg(-1)min(-1)),去甲肾上腺素(10、30、60和100 ng kg(- 1)min(-1))和匹配的安慰剂,在不同情况下以随机顺序排列。无创记录周围血压和心脏指数。脉搏波分析用于确定扩增指数(AIx),该指数可测量全身动脉僵硬度,主动脉僵硬度和中央动脉压。输注两种活性药物均导致外周平均动脉压(PMAP),外周血管阻力,AIx,主动脉僵硬和中心脉压显着增加,但只有血管紧张素II降低了心脏指数。外周血管压力不受血管紧张素II输注的影响,但随着去甲肾上腺素的升高而增加,与血管紧张素II相比,其降压幅度也更大。但是,药物之间的PMAP与AIx和主动脉僵硬度的线性关系没有显着差异。这些结果表明,静脉内输注血管紧张素II和去甲肾上腺素会增加主动脉和全身动脉的僵硬度。尽管对两个参数都有相似的影响,但对于PMAP的给定变化,两种药物对周围脉压和脉压放大的影响不同。这些数据表明,对周围脉压的评估并不总是能够可靠地预测中心脉压或动脉僵硬度的变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号