...
首页> 外文期刊>The lancet oncology >Efficacy and safety of casopitant mesylate, a neurokinin 1 (NK1)-receptor antagonist, in prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving cisplatin-based highly emetogenic chemotherapy: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
【24h】

Efficacy and safety of casopitant mesylate, a neurokinin 1 (NK1)-receptor antagonist, in prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving cisplatin-based highly emetogenic chemotherapy: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

机译:甲磺酸神经舒张素1(NK1)受体拮抗剂casopitant甲磺酸盐在预防以顺铂为基础的高度致呕性化疗患者化疗引起的恶心和呕吐方面的功效和安全性:一项随机,双盲,安慰剂对照试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) remains a clinical management problem after treatment with highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC). We therefore designed and carried out a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to assess whether a three-drug antiemetic regimen of ondansetron, dexamethasone, and the neurokinin-1-receptor antagonist casopitant mesylate was able to prevent acute and delayed CINV events in patients naive to chemotherapy with a malignant solid tumour who were scheduled to receive cisplatin-based HEC regimens. METHODS: The study was done between Nov 6, 2006, and Oct 9, 2007, in 77 participating centres in 22 countries. All 810 patients enrolled in the trial received dexamethasone and ondansetron. Patients were randomly assigned to also receive placebo (n=269), single oral dose of casopitant mesylate (150 mg oral, n=271), or 3-day intravenous plus oral casopitant mesylate (90 mg intravenous on day 1 plus 50 mg oral on days 2 and 3, n=270). Randomisation was done using a central telephone system at the study level, because some centres were expected to recruit only a few patients during the study period. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving complete response (no vomiting, retching, or use of rescue medications) in the first 120 h after receiving HEC. Efficacy analysis was done on the modified intention-to-treat population (n=800), which included all patients who received placebo or study drug and HEC (n=265 control, n=266 single-dose oral casopitant mesylate, n=269 3-day intravenous and oral casopitant mesylate). Safety was reported in 802 patients who received either placebo or study medication. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00431236. FINDINGS: Significantly more patients in each casopitant group achieved complete response in cycle 1 of HEC treatment than did those in the control group (175 [66%] patients in the control group, 228 [86%] in the single-dose oral casopitant mesylate group [p<0.0001 vs control], and 214 [80%] in the 3-day intravenous plus oral casopitant mesylate group (p=0.0004 vs control]). This improvement was sustained over multiple cycles of HEC. Adverse events occurred in 205 (77%) patients in the single-dose oral casopitant mesylate group and 203 (75%) patients in the 3-day intravenous and oral casopitant mesylate group compared with 194 (73%) of patients in the control group. The most common serious adverse events were neutropenia (n=5 [3%] in the control group, n=3 [1%] in the single-dose oral casopitant mesylate group, and n=11 [4%] in the 3-day intravenous plus oral casopitant mesylate group), febrile neutropenia (n=1 [<1%] in the control group, n=4 [1%] in the single-dose oral casopitant mesylate group, and n=6 [2%] in the 3-day intravenous plus oral casopitant mesylate group), and dehydration (n=4 [2%] in the control group, n=2 [<1%] in the single-dose oral casopitant mesylate group, and n=1 [<1%] in the 3-day intravenous plus oral casopitant mesylate group). INTERPRETATION: A three-drug regimen including a single oral dose or 3-day intravenous plus oral regimen of casopitant mesylate plus dexamethasone and ondansetron significantly reduced CINV events in patients receiving HEC compared with a two-drug regimen of dexamethasone and ondansetron. FUNDING: GlaxoSmithKline.
机译:背景:高度致呕的化学疗法(HEC)治疗后,化学疗法引起的恶心和呕吐(CINV)仍然是临床管理问题。因此,我们设计并进行了一项多中心,随机,双盲,安慰剂对照试验,以评估恩丹西酮,地塞米松和神经激肽-1受体拮抗剂甲磺酸甲磺酸盐的三药止吐方案是否能够预防急性和延迟性刚接受化疗的恶性实体瘤患者中的CINV事件,计划接受基于顺铂的HEC方案。方法:该研究在2006年11月6日至2007年10月9日之间,在22个国家的77个参与中心进行。参加试验的所有810名患者均接受了地塞米松和昂丹西酮。随机分配患者接受安慰剂(n = 269),单次口服甲磺酸甲磺酸(150 mg,n = 271)或3天静脉注射加甲磺酸甲磺酸(第1天静脉注射90 mg加50 mg口服)在第2天和第3天,n = 270)。在研究级别使用中央电话系统进行了随机化,因为预计在研究期间一些中心仅招募了少数患者。主要终点是接受HEC后最初120小时内完全缓解(无呕吐,呕吐或使用急救药物)的患者比例。在改良的意向治疗人群(n = 800)上进行了疗效分析,其中包括所有接受安慰剂或研究药物和HEC的患者(n = 265对照,n = 266单剂量口服甲磺酸甲磺酸盐,n = 269) 3天静脉和口服甲磺酸甲磺酸盐)。据报道,有802名接受安慰剂或研究药物的患者存在安全性。该研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,NCT00431236。结论:每个casopitant组在HEC治疗的第1周期中达到完全缓解的患者明显多于对照组(对照组175名[66%]患者,口服甲磺酸casopitant甲磺酸盐228名[86%])组[p <0.0001 vs.对照组],和静脉注射口服甲磺酸甲磺酸盐3天组的214 [80%](p = 0.0004 vs.对照组),这种改善在多个HEC周期中得以维持,在205发生了不良事件单剂量口服甲磺酸甲磺酸盐组的患者为(77%),静脉和甲磺酸甲磺酸盐口服3天组的患者为203(75%),而对照组为194(73%)。不良反应为嗜中性白血球减少症(对照组n = 5 [3%],单剂量口服甲磺酸甲磺酸盐组n = 3 [1%],静脉注射+口服3天n = 11 [4%])甲磺酸甲磺酸钠组),发热性中性粒细胞减少症(对照组,n = 1 [<1%],单剂量口服甲磺酸甲磺酸钠,n = 4 [1%]叶酸组,静脉注射加口服甲磺酸甲磺酸盐3天组n = 6 [2%],脱水组(对照组n = 4 [2%],单组n = 2 [<1%])剂量口服甲磺酸甲磺酸酯组,静脉注射甲磺酸甲磺酸酯3天组n = 1 [<1%]。解释:与单药地塞米松和恩丹西酮的两种药物方案相比,三药方案包括单次口服剂量或三天静脉注射加甲磺酸速乐定加地塞米松和恩丹西酮的口服方案,显着降低了接受HEC的患者的CINV事件。资金来源:葛兰素史克。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号