...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of rheumatology >Time to Score Quantitative Rheumatoid Arthritis Measures: 28-Joint Count, Disease Activity Score, Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), Multidimensional HAQ (MDHAQ), and Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data (RAPID) Scores.
【24h】

Time to Score Quantitative Rheumatoid Arthritis Measures: 28-Joint Count, Disease Activity Score, Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), Multidimensional HAQ (MDHAQ), and Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data (RAPID) Scores.

机译:对类风湿性关节炎定量措施进行评分的时间:28个联合计数,疾病活动评分,健康评估问卷(HAQ),多维HAQ(MDHAQ)和患者索引数据的常规评估(RAPID)评分。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the time required to score different measures used to assess patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), as a guide to feasibility in standard care. The measures studied were a 28-Joint Count, Disease Activity Score (DAS), Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), Multidimensional HAQ (MDHAQ), and various Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data (RAPID) scores derived from the MDHAQ. METHODS: Three rheumatologists at 3 sites performed and timed 28-joint counts in 20 different patients at each site. Each rheumatologist scored and timed identical data in 5 groups of 10 from the same 50 patients seen in standard clinical care, including 50 DAS28 indices using the DAS Website, 50 identical HAQ, and 50 identical MDHAQ from the same patients. The MDHAQ includes 10 activities self-assessed for physical function, 21 circle visual analog scales (VAS) (rather than 10 cm lines), and scoring templates on the questionnaire for physical function, patient self-report joint count and RAPID composite scores. RAPID3 includes the 3 Core Data Set measures, RAPID4 adds the self-report joint count to RAPID3, and RAPID5 adds a physician global estimate to RAPID4. RESULTS: The median number of seconds to complete a 28-joint count was 90, compared to 41.9 s for a HAQ, 9.6 s for an MDHAQ RAPID3, and 19.4 s for RAPID5. CONCLUSION: MDHAQ RAPID3 scores can be calculated in considerably less time than other RA measures, using scoring templates on the MDHAQ, to provide informative, feasible, quantitative measures for standard rheumatology clinical care.
机译:目的:分析评分类风湿性关节炎(RA)患者所需的不同方法所需的时间,以作为标准护理可行性的指南。所研究的措施包括28联合计数,疾病活动评分(DAS),健康评估问卷(HAQ),多维HAQ(MDHAQ),以及从MDHAQ得出的各种常规患者评估指标数据(RAPID)评分。方法:在三个地点的三名风湿病学家对每个地点的20位不同患者进行了28次关节计数并计时。每位风湿病医师对来自标准临床护理中相同50例患者的10组中的5组中的相同数据进行评分和计时,包括使用DAS网站的50 DAS28指数,50相同HAQ和50相同MDHAQ。 MDHAQ包括针对身体功能进行自我评估的10项活动,21圈视觉模拟量表(VAS)(而不是10 cm线),以及针对身体功能,患者自我报告关节计数和RAPID综合评分的问卷模板。 RAPID3包括3个核心数据集度量,RAPID4将自报告联合计数添加到RAPID3,RAPID5将医师全局估计添加到RAPID4。结果:完成28个关节计数的中位数秒数为90,相比之下,HAQ为41.9 s,MDHAQ RAPID3为9.6 s,RAPID5为19.4 s。结论:使用MDHAQ上的评分模板,可以比其他RA测量花费更少的时间计算MDHAQ RAPID3评分,从而为标准的风湿病临床护理提供信息丰富,可行,定量的测量方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号