...
首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet >Randomised trial of isoniazid versus rifampicin and pyrazinamide for prevention of tuberculosis in HIV-1 infection (see comments)
【24h】

Randomised trial of isoniazid versus rifampicin and pyrazinamide for prevention of tuberculosis in HIV-1 infection (see comments)

机译:异烟肼与利福平和吡嗪酰胺在HIV-1感染中预防结核病的随机试验(参见评论)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis is a common complication of HIV-1 infection, especially in developing countries. Practical and effective chemoprophylaxis regimens for HIV-1-related tuberculosis are needed. Our aim was to test the efficacy of isoniazid versus rifampicin with pyrazinamide for prevention of tuberculosis in HIV-1-positive individuals. METHODS: We compared the efficacy of 6 months of isoniazid with 2 months of rifampicin and pyrazinamide for prevention of tuberculosis in HIV-1-seropositive individuals. Eligible participants were aged 16-77 years, HIV-1 seropositive, had a positive purified-protein derivative (PPD) skin test reaction of at least 5 mm, and had a normal chest radiograph. Participants were randomly assigned partially supervised twice weekly isoniazid for 24 weeks or twice weekly rifampicin and pyrazinamide for 8 weeks. Participants were followed up for up to 4 years for the development of tuberculosis and survival. FINDINGS: Tuberculosis developed in 14 (3.8%) of 370 participants assigned isoniazid and 19 (5.0%) of 380 participants assigned rifampicin and pyrazinamide (Cox model rate ratio 1.3 [95% CI 0.7-2.7]). The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the risk of tuberculosis during the first 10 months after entry was 3.7% among participants who received rifampicin and pyrazinamide compared with 1.0% (p=0.03) among participants who received isoniazid, and 5.4% versus 5.1%, respectively (p=0.9) at 36 months after entry. Higher rates of tuberculosis were observed in people with baseline CD4 percentages (of total lymphocytes) of less than 20 (rate ratio 4.0 [95% CI 1.8-9.0]). There were no significant differences in total mortality at any time. INTERPRETATION: Twice-weekly isoniazid preventive therapy for 6 months or rifampicin and pyrazinamide for 2 months provided similar overall protection against tuberculosis in HIV-1-infected, PPD-positive adults. The better protection among recipients of isoniazid during the first 10 months was most likely secondary to the longer duration of chemoprophylaxis. Preventive therapy for HIV-1-seropositive, PPD-positive individuals could be practical in developing countries with a once weekly clinic visit, but optimum duration of chemoprophylaxis has not been determined.
机译:背景:结核病是HIV-1感染的常见并发症,尤其是在发展中国家。需要针对HIV-1相关结核病的实用有效的化学预防方案。我们的目标是测试异烟肼与利福平与吡嗪酰胺对预防HIV-1阳性个体的结核的功效。方法:我们比较了6个月的异烟肼与2个月的利福平和吡嗪酰胺预防HIV-1血清反应阳性的人的结核病的疗效。符合条件的参与者年龄在16-77岁之间,HIV-1血清反应阳性,纯化蛋白衍生物(PPD)皮肤测试反应阳性至少5 mm,并且胸部X光片正常。参加者被随机分配,每星期接受两次异烟肼部分监督,为期24周,或每周两次接受利福平和吡嗪酰胺的监督,为期8周。对参与者进行了长达4年的随访,以了解结核病的发展和生存情况。结果:在分配了异烟肼的370名参与者中,有14名(3.8%)患了肺结核,在分配了利福平和吡嗪酰胺的380名参与者中,有19名(5.0%)(Cox模型比率比1.3 [95%CI 0.7-2.7])。 Kaplan-Meier估计,进入利福平和吡嗪酰胺类药物的患者在进入后的头10个月内患结核的风险为3.7%,而异烟肼类药物的患者为1.0%(p = 0.03),分别为5.4%和5.1% (p = 0.9)在进入后36个月。在基线CD4百分比(总淋巴细胞)小于20的人群中观察到较高的结核病发生率(比率4.0 [95%CI 1.8-9.0])。任何时候总死亡率均无显着差异。解释:每周两次异烟肼预防性治疗6个月,利福平和吡嗪酰胺2个月,对HIV-1感染的PPD阳性成年人提供了类似的全面预防结核病的保护。在头10个月中,对异烟肼接受者的更好的保护很可能是由于化学预防的持续时间较长。对HIV-1血清阳性,PPD阳性的个体进行预防性治疗在发展中国家,每周一次的临床就诊是可行的,但化学预防的最佳持续时间尚未确定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号