...
首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet >Coronary calcification score: the coronary-risk impact factor.
【24h】

Coronary calcification score: the coronary-risk impact factor.

机译:冠状动脉钙化评分:冠心病危险因素。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

CONTEXT: Identification of asymptomatic high-risk individuals is integral to current policies for preventing coronary heart disease, but existing methods of estimating risk lack sensitivity. To overcome this limitation increasing use is being made of non-invasive methods to detect subclinical coronary artery disease--eg, computed tomography (CT) to scan for coronary artery calcification. The location and extent of calcification correlate closely with pathological and angiographic abnormalities, but whether such calcification predicts clinical events, especially in younger individuals, is equivocal. Most data on coronary calcification have been obtained with electron-beam CT, but recently multislice CT, which is more versatile, less expensive, and available in most large hospitals, has been increasingly used. STARTING POINT: Leslee Shaw and colleagues (Radiology 2003; 228: 826-33) showed that the coronary calcification score predicted total mortality within subsets of patients classified at low, intermediate, or high risk according to Framingham criteria. In a cohort of over 10000 individuals, 5-year risk-adjusted survival was 95% when the score was over 1000 compared with 99% for scores of 10 or less. These results agree with other recent studies showing strong correlations between coronary calcification and coronary heart disease events. WHERE NEXT? The increasing use of multislice CT scanners should generate more data for comparison with those obtained from electron-beam CT. Radiation dose, which is higher with multislice than with electron-beam procedures, needs to be reduced, and calcification in scans needs to be quantified more accurately than with existing computer-based analyses. Further studies are needed to establish the predictive power of the coronary calcification score for clinical events and the effects of therapeutic intervention on both these outcomes. It would also be worth investigating the relation between coronary calcification and risk factors not quantified in Framingham-based estimates, including familial and racial predisposition to premature coronary heart disease.
机译:背景:无症状高危人群的识别是当前预防冠心病政策不可或缺的一部分,但是现有的风险评估方法缺乏敏感性。为了克服这一局限性,越来越多地使用非侵入性方法来检测亚临床冠状动脉疾病,例如,计算机断层扫描(CT)扫描冠状动脉钙化。钙化的位置和程度与病理和血管造影异常密切相关,但这种钙化是否能预测临床事件,尤其是在年轻个体中,尚不清楚。大多数关于冠状动脉钙化的数据都是通过电子束CT获得的,但是最近越来越多的多层CT变得更加通用,便宜,并且在大多数大型医院都可以买到。起点:Leslee Shaw及其同事(Radiology 2003; 228:826-33)表明,根据Framingham标准,冠状动脉钙化评分可预测低,中或高风险患者亚组的总死亡率。在超过10000个人的队列中,当得分超过1000时,5年风险调整后的生存率为95%,而得分在10以下的人群则为99%。这些结果与其他近期研究一致,这些研究表明冠状动脉钙化与冠心病事件之间具有很强的相关性。接下来呢?越来越多的多层CT扫描仪使用应产生更多数据,以与从电子束CT获得的数据进行比较。与现有的基于计算机的分析方法相比,多层分析的辐射剂量要比电子束方法更高,并且需要更准确地量化扫描中的钙化。需要进一步的研究来确定冠状动脉钙化评分对临床事件的预测能力以及治疗干预对这两种结果的影响。也有必要调查冠脉钙化与基于Framingham的估计中未量化的危险因素之间的关系,包括家族和种族易患早发性冠心病。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号