...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of trauma >A comparison of the diagnostic performances of visceral organ-targeted versus spine-targeted protocols for the evaluation of spinal fractures using sixteen-channel multidetector row computed tomography: is additional spine-targeted computed tomography necessary to evaluate thoracolumbar spinal fractures in blunt trauma victims?
【24h】

A comparison of the diagnostic performances of visceral organ-targeted versus spine-targeted protocols for the evaluation of spinal fractures using sixteen-channel multidetector row computed tomography: is additional spine-targeted computed tomography necessary to evaluate thoracolumbar spinal fractures in blunt trauma victims?

机译:使用16通道多探测器行计算机断层扫描评估内脏器官靶向和脊柱靶向协议对脊柱骨折的诊断性能的比较:是否需要额外的脊柱靶向计算机体层摄影来评估钝性创伤患者的胸腰椎脊柱骨折?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: It remains to be determined whether spine-targeted computed tomography (thoracolumbar spine computed tomography [TLS-CT]) images and visceral organ-targeted CT (abdominopelvic [AP]-CT) images are comparable for the evaluation of thoracolumbar spinal fractures using 16-channel multidetector row CT. The elimination of an additional spine-targeted CT protocol would substantially reduce time, the storage burden, and potential patient radiation exposure. METHODS: A total of 420 vertebrae in 72 consecutive patients who underwent AP-CT to assess blunt traumatic injury and an additional CT examination using a TLS-CT protocol to evaluate spinal fractures were retrospectively evaluated. The AP-CT set (set A, reconstructed with using a wide display field of view [FOV] and a soft algorithm) and the TLS-CT set (set S, reconstructed using a narrow display FOV and a hard algorithm) were composed of axial plus reformatted sagittal or coronal images or both. Three radiologists independently reviewed all CT data retrospectively. Performances for detecting and typing fractures were compared by using areas under receiver operating characteristic curves and by determining concordance rates. RESULTS: The overall areas under the curves for sets S and A for fracture detection were 0.996 and 0.995, respectively; no significant difference was found between the two sets. Concordance rates for typing performance also showed no statistical significance between the two sets for any of the three observers. CONCLUSION: Sixteen-channel multidetector row CT images reconstructed using a soft algorithm and a wide display FOV that cover the entire abdomen using a visceral organ-targeted protocol with 1.5-mm collimation are sufficient for the evaluation of spine fractures in trauma patients, given that multiplanar-reformatted images are provided.
机译:背景:脊柱靶向计算机断层扫描(胸腰段脊柱计算机断层扫描[TLS-CT])图像和内脏器官靶向CT(腹腔盆腔[AP] -CT)图像是否可用于评估胸腰段脊柱骨折是否具有可比性16通道多探测器行CT。消除其他以脊柱为目标的CT方案将大大减少时间,存储负担和潜在的患者辐射暴露。方法:回顾性评估72例接受AP-CT评估钝性创伤损伤的连续患者420椎骨,并采用TLS-CT方案评估脊柱骨折的附加CT检查进行回顾性评估。 AP-CT集(A组,使用宽显示视野[FOV]和软算法重建)和TLS-CT集(S组,使用窄显示FOV和硬算法重建)由轴向加重新格式化的矢状或冠状图像,或两者兼有。三名放射科医生独立回顾了所有CT数据。通过使用接收器工作特征曲线下的面积并确定一致性率,比较了检测和分类裂缝的性能。结果:用于断裂检测的S和A组曲线下的总面积分别为0.996和0.995;两组之间没有发现显着差异。对于三个观察者中的任何一个,两组打字之间的一致性率也没有统计学意义。结论:采用内脏器官靶向方案和1.5mm准直度,使用软算法和宽显示视野覆盖整个腹部的16通道多探测器行CT图像足以评估创伤患者的脊柱骨折,因为提供了多平面重新格式化的图像。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号