首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Workplace Learning >Learning gaps in a learning organization: professionals'values versus management values
【24h】

Learning gaps in a learning organization: professionals'values versus management values

机译:学习型组织中的学习差距:专业人员的价值观与管理价值观

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - The aim of this article is to challenge the concept of "the learning organization" as unproblematic and inherently good. Design/methodology/approach - The research looked at how teachers - as an example of public sector professionals in a work organization that claims to be a learning organization - view their conditions for learning. Findings - By using this approach, the normative values surrounding the concept of the learning organization were discussed. This approach identifies power-relations: i.e. who has the priority of interpretation to define what learning is desired and considered relevant as well as when, how and where one learns. In addition, it gives indications to how and why the implementations of management concepts are not always successful. Originality/value - This article shows how the implementation of a governance concept (learning organization) in fact can be seen as bringing with it unintended consequences for the organization as a whole - and especially for the professionals. Even within a work organization claiming to be a learning organization, learning gaps can be identified.
机译:目的-本文的目的是挑战“学习型组织”的概念,认为它毫无问题且本质上是好的。设计/方法/方法-该研究着眼于教师(作为声称是学习型组织的工作组织中的公共部门专业人员的示例)如何看待他们的学习条件。调查结果-通过使用这种方法,讨论了围绕学习型组织概念的规范性价值观。这种方法确定了权力关系:即谁具有解释的优先权来定义所需的学习内容,并认为与学习相关以及何时,如何以及在何处学习。此外,它还指出了管理概念的实现方式和方式并非总是成功的原因。原创性/价值-本文说明了如何将治理概念(学习型组织)的实施实际上视为对整个组织(尤其是专业人员)带来了意想不到的后果。即使在声称是学习型组织的工作组织内,也可以发现学习差距。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号