首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Urology >Bipolar transurethral resection in saline--an alternative surgical treatment for bladder outlet obstruction?
【24h】

Bipolar transurethral resection in saline--an alternative surgical treatment for bladder outlet obstruction?

机译:盐水双极型经尿道切除术-膀胱出口梗阻的另一种外科治疗方法?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: The transurethral resection in saline system uses bipolar energy for transurethral prostate resection, thus, avoiding the need for glycine irrigation and its associated complications. We compared the clinical efficacy and safety of bipolar transurethral resection in saline and of monopolar transurethral prostate resection for symptomatic benign prostate hyperplasia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2005 to June 2006, 238 consecutive patients with symptomatic benign prostate hyperplasia were randomized into a prospective, controlled trial comparing the 2 treatment modalities. Patient demographics, operative time, hospital stay and complications were noted. Serum hemoglobin and electrolytes were determined in all patients immediately before and after the endoscopic procedure. RESULTS: During 18 months 120 patients were randomized to the conventional transurethral prostate resection group and 118 were randomized to the transurethral resection in saline group. Patient profiles, weight of resected prostatic tissue and duration of hospitalization were similar in the 2 groups. The decrease in serum sodium and serum chloride was statistically significantly greater in the transurethral prostate resection group than in the transurethral resection in saline group (each p = 0.05). The transurethral resection in saline procedure required significantly more time (mean 56 vs 44 minutes, p <0.01). There was 1 case (0.8%) of transurethral resection syndrome in the transurethral prostate resection group but none in the transurethral resection in saline group. Postoperative bleeding did not significantly differ between the 2 groups. Clot retention was observed in 6 (5%) and 4 patients (3%) in the transurethral prostate resection and transurethral resection in saline group, respectively. Two repeat interventions were required in the transurethral prostate resection group. CONCLUSIONS: The bipolar transurethral resection in saline system is as efficacious as monopolar transurethral prostate resection but it is safer than the latter because of the lesser decrease in postoperative hypernatremia and the smaller risk of transurethral resection syndrome. However, probably due to technical reasons, transurethral resection in saline operative time is significantly longer.
机译:目的:盐水系统中的经尿道切除术使用双极能量进行经尿道前列腺切除术,从而避免了甘氨酸冲洗及其相关并发症的需要。我们比较了有症状的良性前列腺增生的双极经尿道切除术在盐水中和单极经尿道前列腺切除术的临床疗效和安全性。材料与方法:自2005年1月至2006年6月,将238例有症状的前列腺良性增生患者随机分为一项前瞻性对照试验,比较了这两种治疗方式。记录患者的人口统计学,手术时间,住院时间和并发症。在内窥镜检查之前和之后立即测定所有患者的血清血红蛋白和电解质。结果:在18个月内,盐水组将120例患者随机分为常规经尿道前列腺切除术组,而将118例患者随机分为经尿道前列腺电切术。两组的患者概况,切除的前列腺组织的重量和住院时间相似。经尿道前列腺电切术组的血清钠和血清氯化物的减少在统计学上明显大于生理盐水组经尿道电切术(每个p = 0.05)。盐水手术的经尿道切除术需要更长的时间(平均56 vs 44分钟,p <0.01)。经尿道前列腺切除术组有1例(0.8%)经尿道切除综合征,而在盐水组经尿道切除术无1例(0.8%)。两组之间的术后出血无明显差异。盐水组经尿道前列腺电切术和经尿道电切术分别观察到6例(5%)和4例(3%)的血栓保留。经尿道前列腺切除术组需要两次重复干预。结论:盐水系统中双极经尿道切除术与单极经尿道前列腺切除术一样有效,但由于术后高钠血症的减少较少且经尿道切除综合征的风险较小,因此比后者更为安全。但是,可能由于技术原因,经尿道切除术在盐水中的手术时间明显更长。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号