首页> 外文期刊>The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research >Mifepristone plus vaginal misoprostol vs vaginal misoprostol alone for medical abortion in gestation 63 days or less in Nepalese women: a quasi-randomized controlled trial.
【24h】

Mifepristone plus vaginal misoprostol vs vaginal misoprostol alone for medical abortion in gestation 63 days or less in Nepalese women: a quasi-randomized controlled trial.

机译:米非司酮加阴道米索前列醇与单独阴道米索前列醇在妊娠63天或更短时间内用于妊娠的药物流产的比较:一项准随机对照试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

AIM: To compare the efficacy of mifepristone and vaginal misoprostol with misoprostol alone for pregnancy termination up to 63 days. METHOD: This exploratory study was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal as a part of a thesis study for a period of one year from April 2005-2006. After confirming a pregnancy < or =63 days gestation by transvaginal ultrasound, an equal number of women (50) were randomized into (i) group A, women who received 200 mg oral mifepristone (RU 486) on day 1 and vaginal misoprostol 800 microg on day 3; and (ii) group B, women who received vaginal misoprostol (800 microg) on day 1 and 3 (total dose 1600 microg). The primary study outcome measure was complete abortion without surgical intervention making comparisons between these two groups in terms of complete abortion rate, need for manual vacuum aspiration for incomplete abortion and pregnancy continuation after reconfirming the diagnosis on transvaginal ultrasound, besides comparing the side effects/complications. RESULTS: Fewer side effects and a more complete abortion rate (94%) was observed in group A (mifepristone and vaginal misoprostol) in comparison to vaginal misoprostol alone (total dose 1600 microg) giving a complete abortion rate of 86% along with a significant hematocrit drop on follow-up day 10 (P = 0.03) besides having increased duration of bleeding (P = 0.017). CONCLUSION: Mifepristone oral (200 mg) followed by vaginal misoprostol (800 microg) on day 3 provides a better success rate (94%) with fewer complications than vaginal misoprostol 800 microg used on days 1 and 3 for medical abortion of pregnancies up to 63 days.
机译:目的:比较米非司酮和米索前列醇与单独使用米索前列醇终止妊娠长达63天的疗效。方法:这项探索性研究是在尼泊尔加德满都的特里布万大学教学医院妇产科进行的,研究的一部分,从2005年4月至2006年4月。通过经阴道超声证实怀孕≤63天后,将相等数量的妇女(50)随机分为(i)A组,在第1天接受200 mg口服米非司酮(RU 486)和阴道米索前列醇800 microg的妇女在第3天; (ii)B组,在第1天和第3天接受阴道米索前列醇(800微克)(总剂量1600微克)的妇女。主要研究结果指标为完全流产,无需手术干预,比较了两组的完全流产率,不完全流产需要人工真空抽吸和再次确认经阴道超声诊断后继续妊娠,以及比较副作用/并发症。 。结果:与单独使用米索前列醇(总剂量1600微克)相比,A组(米非司酮和阴道米索前列醇)观察到的副作用更少,流产率更高(94%),流产率达到86%,显着降低。术后第10天血细胞比容下降(P = 0.03),出血持续时间增加(P = 0.017)。结论:口服米非司酮(200 mg),然后在第3天进行阴道米索前列醇(800微克),比在第1天和第3天用于药物流产(最高63次)的阴道米索前列醇800微克的成功率更高(94%),并发症更少。天。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号