...
首页> 外文期刊>The annals of pharmacotherapy >Collaboration between pharmacy and laboratory: defining total allowable error limits for therapeutically monitored drugs.
【24h】

Collaboration between pharmacy and laboratory: defining total allowable error limits for therapeutically monitored drugs.

机译:药房与实验室之间的协作:定义治疗监测药物的总允许误差范围。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To define the total allowable variability that is clinically tolerated for certain drug assays performed by the therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) laboratory at our institution. METHODS: The monthly coefficient of variation (CV) for 13 of the most commonly performed drug assays was recorded for two concentrations: the upper and lower limits of the therapeutic range for each drug. A dosing simulation was performed for each drug by using population parameters to estimate the doses that would yield the two target concentrations in an adult patient. The smallest practical dosage adjustment that could be implemented in clinical practice was determined and the serum concentration resulting from this dosage change was estimated. Each change was equated to two standard deviations from the original drug concentration, and the corresponding CV or total allowable error (TEa) was calculated and compared with the laboratory's CV value. RESULTS: The laboratory CV was greater than the clinically defined TEa for amikacin at both trough and peak ranges, and for gentamicin and tobramycin at the trough range. Simulations for a patient with compromised renal function produced TEa values less than the reported CV for amikacin at both trough and peak ranges. Simulations for an obese patient produced TEa values less than the reported CV for amikacin, gentamicin, and tobramycin at both trough and peak ranges. The assay variability for these aminoglycosides is greater than the expected change in serum drug concentrations produced by the dosage changes used in the simulations. The TEa for all other drugs exceeded the laboratory CV, demonstrating assay variability within the clinically tolerated range. CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of how the variability of a drug assay compares with its TEa allows clinicians to assess the usefulness of a serum drug concentration as a clinical tool.
机译:目的:定义由我们机构的治疗药物监测(TDM)实验室进行的某些药物测定在临床上可耐受的总容许变异性。方法:记录两种浓度的13种最常用药物测定的每月变异系数(CV):每种药物的治疗范围上限和下限。通过使用人群参数对每种药物进行剂量模拟,以估算在成年患者中产生两种目标浓度的剂量。确定了可以在临床实践中进行的最小实际剂量调整,并估算了此剂量变化产生的血清浓度。每次变化都等于与原始药物浓度的两个标准偏差,然后计算出相应的CV或总允许误差(TEa),并将其与实验室的CV值进行比较。结果:在谷值和谷值范围内,阿米卡星,谷值范围内的庆大霉素和妥布霉素的实验室CV均大于临床定义的TEa。在谷值和谷值范围内,模拟肾功能不全的患者产生的TEa值均低于报道的丁胺卡那霉素的CV。对于肥胖患者的模拟,在谷值和峰值范围内,阿米卡星,庆大霉素和妥布霉素的TEa值均低于报告的CV。这些氨基糖苷的测定变异性大于模拟中使用的剂量变化产生的血清药物浓度的预期变化。所有其他药物的TEa都超过了实验室CV,证明了在临床耐受范围内的测定变异性。结论:了解药物测定的变异性与其TEa相比如何,可让临床医生评估血清药物浓度作为临床工具的有用性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号