...
首页> 外文期刊>The Annals of occupational hygiene. >Development and evaluation of an exposure control efficacy library (ECEL).
【24h】

Development and evaluation of an exposure control efficacy library (ECEL).

机译:暴露控制功效库(EXCEL)的开发和评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: This paper describes the development and evaluation of an evidence database on the effectiveness of risk management measures (RMMs) to control inhalation exposure. This database is referred to as Exposure Control Efficacy Library (ECEL). METHODS: A comprehensive review of scientific journals in the occupational hygiene field was undertaken. Efficacy values for RMMs in conjunction with contextual information on study design, sampling strategy and measurement type (among other parameters) were stored in an MS Access database. In total, 433 efficacy values for six RMM groups (i.e. enclosure, local exhaust ventilation, specialized ventilation, general ventilation, suppression techniques and separation of the worker) were collected from 90 peer-reviewed publications. These RMM categories were subdivided into more specific categories. RESULTS: Estimated average efficacy values ranged from 87% for specialized ventilation to 43% for general ventilation. Substantial variation in efficacy values was observed within RMM categories based on differences in selected covariables within each study (i.e. study design, sampling strategy, measurement type and others). More contrast in efficacy values was observed when evaluating more detailed subcategories. CONCLUSIONS: It is envisaged that ECEL will contribute to exposure modelling, but should be supplemented with expert opinion, preferably in a formal expert elicitation procedure. The work presented here should be considered as a first attempt to collate and analyse RMM efficacy values and inclusion of additional (unpublished) exposure data is highly warranted.
机译:目的:本文介绍了证据数据库的开发和评估,该证据数据库涉及风险管理措施(RMM)控制吸入暴露的有效性。该数据库被称为暴露控制功效库(ECEL)。方法:对职业卫生领域的科学期刊进行了全面审查。 RMM的功效值连同研究设计,采样策略和测量类型(以及其他参数)的上下文信息一起存储在MS Access数据库中。总共从90篇经同行评审的出版物中收集了六个RMM组的433个功效值(即围护,局部排气通风,专门通风,一般通风,抑制技术和工人分离)。这些RMM类别又细分为更具体的类别。结果:估计的平均功效值范围从专门通气的87%到一般通气的43%。根据每项研究中所选协变量的差异(即研究设计,抽样策略,测量类型等),在RMM类别中观察到功效值存在很大差异。在评估更详细的子类别时,观察到功效值的对比更大。结论:预计ECEL将有助于暴露模型的建立,但应以专家意见为补充,最好以正式的专家引诱程序进行。此处介绍的工作应被视为整理和分析RMM功效值的首次尝试,并且强烈建议包含其他(未发表)暴露数据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号