...
首页> 外文期刊>The journal of pain: official journal of the American Pain Society >Hypervigilance and attentional fixedness in chronic musculoskeletal pain: consistency of findings across modified stroop and dot-probe tasks.
【24h】

Hypervigilance and attentional fixedness in chronic musculoskeletal pain: consistency of findings across modified stroop and dot-probe tasks.

机译:慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛中的过度警惕和注意固定性:修改后的步幅和点探针任务中发现的一致性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Results from modified Stroop and dot-probe tasks have provided mixed evidence regarding attentional biases for sensory and affect pain stimuli in chronic pain patients. No studies have compared the same groups of chronic pain and healthy control participants on both tasks. We tested 36 patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain and 29 healthy control subjects on the modified Stroop and dot-probe tasks. Stimuli comprised affect pain, sensory pain, physical catastrophe, and neutral words. There was no evidence to suggest differential processing of threat cues by patients and control subjects on the modified Stroop task. All participants did, however, show differential processing of affect pain words. This was evident on both masked and unmasked presentation formats. There were no significant interactions between clinical status and threat word type observed for any of the indices of selective attention derived from the dot-probe task, but all participants had difficulty disengaging attention from affective pain and health catastrophe words. Findings were not influenced by individual differences in mood, anxiety, or fear of pain. Correlational analyses of the standard (unmasked) Stroop interference index and dot-probe indices of selective attention revealed a consistent lack of significant association, suggesting that the 2 tasks might be measuring different phenomena. Taken together, these findings provide evidence that chronic pain patients and healthy control participants do not differ in the way they attend to threatening linguistic stimuli. PERSPECTIVE: Some patients with chronic pain might have trouble paying attention to anything other than the affective components of pain and associated catastrophic health consequences. Interventions that specifically target this attentional fixedness might facilitate shifting attention to other targets and thereby reduce pain-specific anxiety and fear.
机译:改进的Stroop和点探针任务的结果提供了关于慢性疼痛患者的感觉偏见和影响疼痛刺激的混合证据。没有研究在这两个任务上比较相同组的慢性疼痛和健康对照者。我们在改良的Stroop和点探针任务上测试了36例慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛患者和29名健康对照受试者。刺激包括影响疼痛,感觉疼痛,身体灾难和中性语言。没有证据表明在改良的Stroop任务上,患者和对照对象对威胁线索的区别处理。但是,所有参与者的确表现出不同的情感痛苦词处理方式。这在蒙版和非蒙版演示文稿格式上都很明显。从点探针任务获得的任何选择性注意指标中,临床状态和威胁词类型之间均未观察到明显的相互作用,但所有参与者都难以将注意力从情感性疼痛和健康灾难性单词中分离出来。研究结果不受情绪,焦虑或恐惧恐惧的个体差异的影响。对标准(未掩盖的)Stroop干扰指数和选择性关注点探针指数的相关分析显示,始终缺乏显着关联,表明这两项任务可能正在衡量不同的现象。综上所述,这些发现提供了证据,证明慢性疼痛患者和健康对照组的参与者在威胁语言刺激方面的方式没有差异。观点:某些慢性疼痛患者可能难以集中精力关注疼痛的情感成分和相关的灾难性健康后果。专门针对这种注意力固定的干预措施可能有助于将注意力转移到其他目标上,从而减少特定于疼痛的焦虑和恐惧。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号