...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of neuroscience nursing: journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses >To provoke or not provoke: ethical considerations in the epilepsy monitoring unit.
【24h】

To provoke or not provoke: ethical considerations in the epilepsy monitoring unit.

机译:招惹或不招惹:癫痫监测部门的道德考量。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Epilepsy is the second most common neurological disorder after migraines and headaches, with an economic burden of 15.5 billion dollars annually. Most patients with epilepsy can be controlled with antiepileptic drugs. Those who remain uncontrolled are considered refractory and are often admitted to an epilepsy monitoring unit for definitive diagnosis. Nonepileptic seizures are a common differential diagnosis in persons with refractory seizures. It is helpful for providers to witness the patients' seizures to make a definitive diagnosis for seizure classification. Frequently, unstandardized practice-provocation techniques are employed in an epilepsy monitoring unit setting. The purpose of these techniques is to elicit a seizure. A debate is occurring on whether the use of provocation techniques is ethical and necessary. This article will review the literature related to the current evidence and moral opinions swirling around this topic. It is important for the neuroscience nurse to be familiar with both sides of the seizure provocation debate as he or she will be on the front lines of shaping future policy and practice to come.
机译:癫痫病是仅次于偏头痛和头痛的第二大最常见的神经系统疾病,每年的经济负担为155亿美元。大多数癫痫患者可以用抗癫痫药控制。那些不受控制的人被认为是难治性的,通常被送入癫痫监测部门进行明确诊断。非癫痫性癫痫发作是难治性癫痫患者的常见鉴别诊断。提供者可以见证患者的癫痫发作,从而对癫痫发作的分类做出明确的诊断。通常,在癫痫监测单元中使用非标准化的练习激发技术。这些技术的目的是引起癫痫发作。关于挑衅技巧的使用是否合乎道德和必要性的争论正在展开。本文将回顾与该主题相关的当前证据和道德观点相关的文献。对于神经科学护士来说,熟悉癫痫激发辩论的双方非常重要,因为他或她将站在制定未来政策和实践的第一线。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号