首页> 外文期刊>The journal of knee surgery >Shear force at failure and stiffness of all-inside meniscal repair devices.
【24h】

Shear force at failure and stiffness of all-inside meniscal repair devices.

机译:全内侧半月板修复装置在破坏时的剪切力和刚度。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The purpose of this study was to determine the failure load and stiffness of various meniscal repair devices. A total of 61 fresh-frozen porcine menisci (medial and lateral) were used for the study. A 30-mm vertical, full-thickness tear was created and repaired using one of three all-inside fixation devices and one inside-out repair in the vertical mattress pattern. We used the MaxBraid (Biomet, Warsaw, IN) inside-out suture as a control. The other devices tested were the Meniscal Cinch (Arthrex, Naples, FL), Ultra FasT-Fix (Smith & Nephew, Andover, MA), and the MaxFire MarXmen (Biomet, Warsaw, IN). In addition, two devices, MaxFire MarXmen and Ultra FasT-Fix, were tested using a horizontal mattress configuration. Using the vertical mattress pattern, the Meniscal Cinch had the highest average load to failure. The Meniscal Cinch was significantly less stiff than the other three devices (p < 0.04). For the MarXmen and Ultra FasT-Fix, no differences were noted for load to failure between horizontal and vertical mattress patterns. The mode of failure was significantly different when comparing the two different surgical techniques for the MaxFire MarXmen (p = 0.005). The MaxFire MarXmen device produced a significantly stiffer (p < 0.001) construct when following the manufacturer's instructions (5.8 N/mm) than with the technique used for the other all-inside devices (2.5 N/mm) The Meniscal Cinch had the highest load-to-failure value but the lowest stiffness of the group in the vertical mattress configuration. There was little difference in biomechanical properties between vertical and horizontal repair. Importantly, there was a significant difference in stiffness and failure mode for the MaxFire MarXmen when the manufacturer guidelines were not specifically followed. Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.
机译:这项研究的目的是确定各种半月板修复设备的失效载荷和刚度。总共使用了61个新鲜冷冻的猪半月板(内侧和外侧)。使用三个全内侧固定装置之一和垂直床垫样式的一个由内而外的修复装置,创建并修复了30毫米的垂直全层撕裂。我们使用MaxBraid(Biomet,华沙,印第安纳州)的内外缝合作为对照。测试的其他设备是Meniscal Cinch(位于佛罗里达州那不勒斯市的Arthrex公司),Ultra FasT-Fix(位于马萨诸塞州安德弗市的Smith&Nephew公司)和MaxFire MarXmen(位于印第安纳州华沙的Biomet公司)。此外,还使用水平床垫配置对MaxFire MarXmen和Ultra FasT-Fix这两种设备进行了测试。使用垂直床垫图案,Meniscal Cinch的平均平均破坏载荷最高。 Meniscal Cinch的硬度明显低于其他三个装置(p <0.04)。对于MarXmen和Ultra FasT-Fix,水平和垂直床垫样式之间的破坏载荷没有发现差异。当比较两种不同的MaxFire MarXmen手术技术时,失败的方式有显着差异(p = 0.005)。遵循制造商的说明(5.8 N / mm)时,MaxFire MarXmen设备产生了比其他全内置设备所使用的技术(2.5 N / mm)明显更硬的结构(p <0.001)。Meniscal Cinch的负载最高-破坏值,但在垂直床垫配置中该组的最低刚度。垂直和水平修复之间的生物力学性能差异不大。重要的是,如果未特别遵循制造商指南,则MaxFire MarXmen的刚度和破坏模式会有很大差异。美国纽约第七大街333号Thieme Medical Publishers,美国纽约。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号