首页> 外文期刊>The journal of knee surgery >The efficacy of combined cryotherapy and compression compared with cryotherapy alone following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
【24h】

The efficacy of combined cryotherapy and compression compared with cryotherapy alone following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

机译:前交叉韧带重建术后冷冻疗法和压迫疗法相比较单独冷冻疗法的疗效。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

While cryotherapy has been shown to decrease postoperative pain after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, less is known of the effects of combined cryotherapy and compression. The goal of this study was to compare subjective and objective patient outcomes following ACL reconstruction with combined compression and cryotherapy compared with traditional ice therapy alone. Patients undergoing ACL reconstruction were randomized to cryotherapy/compression device (group 1) or a standardized ice pack (group 2). Both groups were instructed to use the ice or cryotherapy/compression device three times per day and return to the clinic at 1, 2, and 6 weeks postoperatively. Patient-derived outcome measurements used in this study consisted of the visual analog scale (VAS), the Lysholm knee score, Short Form-36 (SF-36), and single assessment numerical evaluation (SANE). Circumferential measurements of the knee at three locations (1 cm proximal to patella, mid-patella, and 1 cm distal to patella) were also obtained as a measure of postoperative edema. Narcotic medication use was recorded by questionnaire. The primary outcome measure (VAS) was significantly different among groups in the preoperative measurement, despite similarities in group demographics. Baseline VAS for group 1 was 54.9 compared with group 2 at 35.6 (p = 0.01). By 6 weeks, this had lowered to 28.1 and 40.3, respectively, resulting in a significant 27-point decrease in mean VAS for group 1 (p < 0.0001). However, the small increase in VAS for group 2 was not significant (p = 0.34). No significant differences were noted for the Lysholm, SF-36, or SANE scores either between groups or time points. Furthermore, no significant differences were noted for any of the circumferential measurements either between groups or time points. Of all patients, 83% of group 1 discontinued narcotic use by 6 weeks, compared with only 28% of group 2 (p = 0.0008). The use of combined cryotherapy and compression in the postoperative period after ACL reconstruction results in improved, short-term pain relief and a greater likelihood of independence from narcotic use compared with cryotherapy alone.
机译:虽然冷冻疗法已显示可减轻前交叉韧带(ACL)重建后的术后疼痛,但对冷冻疗法和加压疗法相结合的效果知之甚少。这项研究的目的是比较与单独传统的冰疗法相比,联合压缩和冷冻疗法的ACL重建后的主观和客观患者预后。接受ACL重建的患者被随机分配至冷冻治疗/加压装置(第1组)或标准化冰袋(第2组)。两组均被指示每天使用冰或冷冻疗法/加压装置三次,并在术后1、2和6周返回诊所。在这项研究中使用的患者派生结果测量包括视觉模拟量表(VAS),Lysholm膝关节评分,Short Form-36(SF-36)和单次评估数值评估(SANE)。还获得了膝盖三个位置(骨近端1 cm,mid骨中部和distal骨远端1 cm)的周向测量值,作为术后水肿的量度。通过问卷记录麻醉药物的使用情况。尽管两组的人口统计学特征相似,但术前的主要结局指标(VAS)在各组之间仍存在显着差异。第1组的基准VAS为54.9,而第2组为35.6(p = 0.01)。到6周时,这分别降至28.1和40.3,导致第1组的平均VAS显着降低了27点(p <0.0001)。但是,第2组的VAS的小幅增加并不显着(p = 0.34)。组或时间点之间的Lysholm,SF-36或SANE得分均无明显差异。此外,对于组之间或时间点之间的任何圆周测量,均未发现明显差异。在所有患者中,第1组中有83%的人在6周前停止使用麻醉剂,而第2组中只有28%(p = 0.0008)。与单独使用冷冻疗法相比,在ACL重建后的术后期联合使用冷冻疗法和加压疗法可改善短期疼痛,并有更多的独立于麻醉用途的可能性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号