首页> 外文期刊>The journal of knee surgery >Suture repair versus arrow repair for symptomatic meniscus tears of the knee: a systematic review.
【24h】

Suture repair versus arrow repair for symptomatic meniscus tears of the knee: a systematic review.

机译:缝合修复与箭头修复膝部有症状的半月板撕裂:系统评价。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A healthy meniscus is important for normal function of the knee. Numerous studies support that the repair of a torn meniscus is important to prevent degenerative changes in the knee. The ability to repair torn menisci is based on several factors including location, tear orientation, chronicity, and concomitant ligamentous knee injuries. In this systematic review, meniscal repair technology is evaluated. Specifically, the retear rates are compared between the arrow repair and the suture repair techniques. After searching three databases (PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Embase) and reviewing annual meeting abstracts from the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (2005 to 2010), four studies (two observational and two randomized controlled trials) were selected for this systematic review. Due to the limited study number and variability between studies (study design, sample population, outcome measures, and surgical technique), a meta-analysis was not performed. The overall quality of the literature was poor and thus conclusions are limited. No clear superiority of one technique was determined by this review.
机译:健康的半月板对于膝盖的正常功能很重要。大量研究表明,半月板撕裂的修复对防止膝关节退行性变很重要。修复半月板撕裂的能力取决于几个因素,包括位置,泪液方向,慢性和伴随的韧带韧带损伤。在本系统综述中,对半月板修复技术进行了评估。具体而言,将箭头修复和缝合修复技术之间的后退率进行比较。在搜索了三个数据库(PubMed,Cochrane对照试验中央注册和Embase)并审查了美国运动医学骨科学会的年度会议摘要(2005年至2010年)之后,选择了四项研究(两项观察性研究和两项随机对照试验)作为研究对象。这项系统的审查。由于研究数量有限且研究之间存在差异(研究设计,样本人群,结局指标和手术技术),因此未进行荟萃分析。文献的整体质量很差,因此结论有限。这项审查没有确定一种技术的明显优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号