首页> 外文期刊>The journal of knee surgery >An institution-specific analysis of ACL reconstruction failure.
【24h】

An institution-specific analysis of ACL reconstruction failure.

机译:针对ACL重建失败的机构特定分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The purpose of this study was to determine the most common causes of failed anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using modern reconstructive techniques at a single, high-volume institution. In addition, the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing revision ACLR will be reported. The surgical logs of four senior knee surgeons were retrospectively reviewed for all patients who had undergone ACLR between 2002 and 2009. Patients were excluded if they did not have both the primary and revision surgery on the same knee with the same surgeon. Out of 1944 ACL reconstructions, 28 patients (56 reconstructions) were included in the study. Radiographic studies, operative reports, KT-1000 scores, and chart notes were used to identify all potential factors that may have led to failure. All patients were invited to return for a follow-up examination and survey. Of the 28 patients, the mean age at the index and revision procedure was 22 +/- 11 (range, 12 to 50) and 24 +/- 11 (range, 14 to 57), respectively. In 20 cases, the cause of failure was determined to be acute trauma (sports, work, or accident); in 1 case, the cause was biologic failure; while in 7 cases, the cause was technical error. During the study period the surgeons performed a combined total of 1944 procedures, for an overall failure rate of 1.8%. Twenty patients (71%) were available for follow-up at a mean 30.2 +/- 17.7 months. The overall postrevision outcomes were good to excellent for a majority of patients, with an average Lysholm score of 84 +/- 15.5 and International Knee Documentation Committee score of 77.2 +/- 13.8. The pre- and postoperative KT-1000 scores were 12.1 +/- 2.8 and 6.7 +/- 2.8, respectively. The results from this study suggest that traumatic re-injury, and not surgical/surgeon error, is the most common cause of ACLR failure using anatomic reconstructive principles and strong fixation. In addition, good to excellent outcomes following revision ACLR can be expected in the majority of patients.
机译:这项研究的目的是在单一的高容量机构中使用现代重建技术确定前交叉韧带重建失败的最常见原因。此外,还将报告接受ACLR修订版的患者的临床结局。回顾性分析了2002年至2009年间接受过ACLR手术治疗的所有四名高级膝关节外科医生的手术记录。如果患者在同一位膝关节外科医生的同时没有同时进行初次和翻修手术,则将其排除在外。在1944例ACL重建中,有28例患者(56例重建)被纳入研究。影像学研究,手术报告,KT-1000评分和图表注释被用于识别可能导致失败的所有潜在因素。邀请所有患者返回进行随访检查和调查。在这28例患者中,分期和修订程序的平均年龄分别为22 +/- 11(范围为12至50)和24 +/- 11(范围为14至57)。在20例中,失败的原因被确定为急性创伤(体育,工作或事故);在1例中,原因是生物学失败;而在7例中,原因是技术错误。在研究期间,外科医生总共执行了1944次手术,总失败率为1.8%。 20名患者(71%)可以接受平均30.2 +/- 17.7个月的随访。修订后的总体结果对大多数患者而言是好还是极好,Lysholm的平均得分为84 +/- 15.5,国际膝关节文献委员会的得分为77.2 +/- 13.8。术前和术后KT-1000评分分别为12.1 +/- 2.8和6.7 +/- 2.8。这项研究的结果表明,使用解剖重建原理和牢固的固定方法,外伤性再损伤而非手术/外科医生错误是ACLR失败的最常见原因。此外,大多数患者有望在改版ACLR后获得良好的效果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号