【24h】

Another view of the Men's Health 'Movement': The debate continues

机译:男性健康“运动”的另一种观点:辩论仍在继续

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In the September 2006 edition of The Journal of Men's Health and Gender, Michael Fitzpatrick writes a compelling and impassioned critique of the Men's Health Movement. While one cannot help but admire the depth of his feelings and how well he expresses himself, it is the view of this writer that his conclusions are erroneous, at least as seen from the perspective of the USA. I would like to discuss, point by point, the areas of real difference in the hopes of illuminating these issues and adding depth and breadth to the discussion.
机译:在2006年9月的《男性健康与性别杂志》中,迈克尔·菲茨帕特里克(Michael Fitzpatrick)对男性健康运动写了一篇引人注目的充满激情的评论。尽管不禁佩服他的感情之深和表达方式之好,但至少从美国的角度来看,作者认为他的结论是错误的。我想逐点讨论真正不同的领域,以期阐明这些问题并增加讨论的深度和广度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号