...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of arthroplasty >A Long-Term Survivorship Comparison Between Cemented and Uncemented Cups With Shelf Grafts in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty After Dysplasia
【24h】

A Long-Term Survivorship Comparison Between Cemented and Uncemented Cups With Shelf Grafts in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty After Dysplasia

机译:水泥杯和非水泥杯带支架移植在异型增生后翻修全髋关节置换术中的长期存活率比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Long-term outcomes of cemented and uncemented cups were compared in patients with hip dysplasia who had undergone revision hip arthroplasty. Patients had uncontained superolateral acetabular defects reconstructed with a structural allograft. This retrospective study compared 18 cemented acetabular cups to 27 uncemented acetabular cups. Average follow-up was 216 months (range, 96-312). Nineteen acetabular cups (42%) failed due to loosening and were revised. The 10- and 20-year cup survival was 88% and 76% in the uncemented group and 67% and 36% in the cemented group. Log rank analysis showed this difference to be significant (P = .0077). Uncemented acetabular cups performed significantly better than cemented cups. ? 2013 Elsevier Inc.
机译:比较了接受翻修髋关节置换术的髋关节发育不良患者的水泥杯和非水泥杯的长期效果。患者具有同种异体结构重建的不完整的上髋臼缺损。这项回顾性研究比较了18个骨水泥髋臼杯和27个非骨水泥髋臼杯。平均随访216个月(范围96-312)。 19个髋臼杯(42%)由于松动而失败,并进行了修订。非骨水泥组的10年和20年杯生存率分别为88%和76%,骨水泥组为67%和36%。对数秩分析表明,这种差异是显着的(P = .0077)。未骨水泥髋臼杯的性能明显好于骨水泥杯。 ? 2013爱思唯尔公司

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号