首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of arthroplasty >Effect of stem stiffness and bone stiffness on bone remodeling in cemented total hip replacement.
【24h】

Effect of stem stiffness and bone stiffness on bone remodeling in cemented total hip replacement.

机译:骨水泥固定全髋关节置换术中茎硬度和骨硬度对骨重塑的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The hypothesis in this study is that the stem stiffness-to-bone stiffness ratio influences the incidence and type of bone remodeling and fixation with cemented total hip arthroplasty. Ninety-one patients with 99 hips had cemented stems using 3 different anatomic porous replacement designs. The APR I and APR II titanium stems with proximal porous coating on the proximal one fourth of the stem were cemented into 49 and 35 patients. The APR II-C stem, which is a cobalt-chrome stem only for cemented fixation, was cemented into 15 patients. These 3 different stem designs were used to study different metals as well as different stem shapes. The average follow-up was 4.3 years (range, 2-10 years) with all hips having 2 years' follow-up and 42 hips at least 5 years' follow-up. Bone remodeling was measured as stress shielding, calcar resorption, and distal hypertrophy on anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of the hip. Stress shielding was measured by the 4 grades described by Engh. A stem stiffness-to-femoral bone stiffness ratio was calculated from the plain radiographs with the stem stiffness known from the manufacturer and the bone stiffness calculated using measurements of the outer and inner diameters of the femur. There was no statistical difference for bone remodeling and fixation between the 3 stem shapes or 2 metal types used in these hips. No stem was loose, and only 10 had radiolucent lines. Stress shielding was statistically related to stem stiffness but was more strongly related to the axial stiffness ratio, mediolateral bending stiffness ratio, anteroposterior stiffness ratio, and torsional stiffness ratio. Stress shielding grade 3 and 4 was present in 20% of hips with a torsional stiffness ratio < 0.33, in 38% of hips with a torsional stiffness ratio of 0.34 to 0.5, and in 70% of hips with a torsional stiffness ratio > 0.5. Five-year results showed no statistical change in stress shielding, calcar resorption, and distal hypertrophy from the 2-year observations. The stem stiffness-to-bone stiffness ratio influenced bone remodeling but not fixation of these cemented stems.
机译:在这项研究中的假设是,骨干刚度与骨刚度之比会影响全髋关节置换术中骨重塑和固定的发生率和类型。 91名髋关节99例患者使用3种不同的解剖结构多孔置换设计固定了茎。将APR I和APR II钛制茎杆的近端四分之一上有近端多孔涂层,将其固定在49例和35例患者中。 APR II-C茎是仅用于骨水泥固定的钴铬骨茎,被骨水泥固定在15例患者中。这3种不同的阀杆设计用于研究不同的金属以及不同的阀杆形状。平均随访时间为4.3年(范围2-10年),所有髋关节均接受了2年随访,42髋至少接受了5年随访。在髋关节前后位片上测量骨重塑,作为应力屏蔽,骨膜吸收和远端肥大。应力屏蔽通过Engh描述的4个等级进行测量。根据普通X射线照片,使用制造商已知的杆刚度来计算杆刚度与股骨的骨刚度之比,并使用股骨外径和内径的测量结果来计算骨刚度。在这些髋部使用的3种茎形状或2种金属类型之间,骨重塑和固定没有统计学差异。没有茎松动,只有10条具有射线可透线。应力屏蔽在统计上与杆的刚度相关,但与轴向刚度比,中外侧弯曲刚度比,前后刚度比和扭转刚度比更紧密相关。在20%的髋部中,抗扭刚度比<0.33;在38%的髋部中,抗扭刚度比为0.34至0.5;在70%的髋部中,抗扭刚度比> 0.5,存在3级和4级应力屏蔽。五年的结果显示,从两年的观察中,应力屏蔽,骨car吸收和远端肥大没有统计学变化。骨干刚度与骨刚度之比影响骨重塑,但不影响这些骨干的固定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号