...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of dermatology >Facial Psoriasis Log-based Area and Severity Index: A valid and reliable severity measurement method detecting improvement of facial psoriasis in clinical practice settings
【24h】

Facial Psoriasis Log-based Area and Severity Index: A valid and reliable severity measurement method detecting improvement of facial psoriasis in clinical practice settings

机译:基于面部牛皮癣对数的面积和严重程度指数:一种有效且可靠的严重程度测量方法,可在临床实践中检测面部牛皮癣的改善情况

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Facial psoriasis is often observed in moderate to severe degrees of psoriasis. While we previously demonstrated construct validity of the facial Psoriasis Log-based Area and Severity Index (fPLASI) system for the cross-sectional evaluation of facial psoriasis, its reliability and accuracy to detect clinical improvement has not been confirmed yet. The aim of this study is to analyze whether the fPLASI properly represents the range of improvement for facial psoriasis compared with the existing facial Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (fPASI) after receiving systemic treatments in clinical practice settings. The changing severity of facial psoriasis for 118 patients was calculated by the scales of fPASI and fPLASI between two time points after systemic treatments. Then, percentage changes (fPASI and fPLASI) were analyzed from the perspective of both the Physician's Global Assessment of effectiveness (PGA) and patients' Subjective Global Assessment (SGA). As a result, the distribution of the fPASI was more heavily clustered around the low score range compared with the fPLASI at both first and second visits. Linear regression analysis between fPASI and fPLASI shows that the correlation coefficient was 0.94, and fPLASI represented greater percentage changes than fPASI. Remarkably, degrees of clinical improvement measured by the PGA matched better with fPLASI, while fPASI underestimated clinical improvements compared with fPLASI from treatment-responding groups by the PGA and SGA. In conclusion, the fPLASI represented clinical improvement of facial psoriasis with more sensitivity and reliability compared with the fPASI. Therefore, the PLASI system would be a viable severity measurement method for facial psoriasis in clinical practice.
机译:经常在中度至严重程度的牛皮癣中观察到面部牛皮癣。尽管我们先前证明了基于面部牛皮癣对数的面积和严重性指数(fPLASI)系统的构造有效性对面部牛皮癣的横断面评估,但尚未证实其检测临床改善的可靠性和准确性。这项研究的目的是分析在临床实践中接受全身性治疗后,与现有的面部牛皮癣面积和严重性指数(fPASI)相比,fPLASI是否能正确代表面部牛皮癣的改善范围。通过全身性治疗后两个时间点之间的fPASI和fPLASI量表,计算了118例面部牛皮癣的严重程度变化。然后,从医师的总体有效性评估(PGA)和患者的主观总体评估(SGA)的角度分析百分比变化(fPASI和fPLASI)。结果,与第一次访问和第二次访问中的fPLASI相比,fPASI的分布在低分范围内更为集中。 fPASI和fPLASI之间的线性回归分析表明,相关系数为0.94,并且fPLASI所代表的百分比变化大于fPASI。值得注意的是,与PGA和SGA治疗反应组的fPLASI相比,PGA所测量的临床改善程度与fPLASI更好地匹配,而fPASI却低估了临床改善。总之,与fPASI相比,fPLASI代表了面部牛皮癣的临床改善,具有更高的敏感性和可靠性。因此,PLASI系统将是临床实践中针对面部牛皮癣的一种可行的严重程度测量方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号