...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Chemical Physics >ACCURACY AND EFFICIENCY OF THE PARTICLE MESH EWALD METHOD
【24h】

ACCURACY AND EFFICIENCY OF THE PARTICLE MESH EWALD METHOD

机译:粒子网格EWALD方法的准确性和效率

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this article a recently proposed method called the particle mesh Ewald (PME) method for computing the long ranged Coulomb interactions in for example molecular dynamics simulations is studied. The PME method has a complexity O(N log N), where N is the total number of charges. This complexity should in particular be compared with the complexity O(N-3/2) for the well known Ewald method and O(N) for the rather new (but already famous) fast multipole method (FMM). However, these complexities say nothing about which method is fastest at some finite N. The purpose of this article is thus to study the PME method and compare its efficiency with the Ewald method and the fast multipole method. To enable this, a theoretical estimate for the accuracy of the PME method as function of its truncation parameters is derived. It is shown that this estimate is very precise by comparing it with results obtained from molecular dynamics simulations of a molten NaCl. Based on this estimate and very careful time experiments, the overall necessary time overhead for the PME method as function of N and a required accuracy is predicted. By a direct comparison with a similar prediction for the Ewald method and by studying existing Ewald-FMM comparisons, it is found that the PME method is significantly faster than both the Ewald method and the fast multipole method in the important decades N similar or equal to 10(4)-10(5). (C) 1995 American Institute of Physics. [References: 22]
机译:在本文中,研究了一种最近提出的称为粒子网格Ewald(PME)方法的方法,该方法用于在例如分子动力学模拟中计算远程库仑相互作用。 PME方法的复杂度为O(N log N),其中N是总电荷数。尤其应该将此复杂性与众所周知的Ewald方法的复杂度O(N-3 / 2)和相当新的(但已经很出名的)快速多极方法(FMM)的O(N)进行比较。但是,这些复杂性并不能说明哪种方法在某个有限的N下最快。本文的目的是研究PME方法并将其效率与Ewald方法和快速多极方法进行比较。为了做到这一点,推导了根据PME方法的截断参数对PME方法的准确性进行的理论估计。通过与熔融NaCl的分子动力学模拟获得的结果进行比较,可以看出该估计值非常精确。基于此估计值和非常仔细的时间实验,可以预测PME方法作为N和所需精度的函数所需的总时间。通过与Ewald方法的相似预测值的直接比较以及研究现有Ewald-FMM比较的结果,发现PME方法在重要的几十个N等于或等于N的情况下显着快于Ewald方法和快速多极方法。 10(4)-10(5)。 (C)1995年美国物理研究所。 [参考:22]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号