首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy >Prevention of febrile leucopenia after chemotherapy in high-risk breast cancer patients: no significant difference between granulocyte-colony stimulating growth factor or ciprofloxacin plus amphotericin B.
【24h】

Prevention of febrile leucopenia after chemotherapy in high-risk breast cancer patients: no significant difference between granulocyte-colony stimulating growth factor or ciprofloxacin plus amphotericin B.

机译:高危乳腺癌患者化疗后的发热性白细胞减少症的预防:粒细胞集落刺激性生长因子或环丙沙星加两性霉素B之间无显着差异。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In a prospective randomized trial, 40 stage IV breast cancer patients undergoing intermediate high-dose chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, 5-fluorouracil plus epirubicin or methotrexate), received either recombinant human G-CSF (rhG-CSF, group I) or ciprofloxacin and amphotericin B (CAB, group II) for prevention of febrile leucopenia (FL). In group I, seven of 18 patients developed FL (after 10/108 courses); in group II, seven of 22 patients (7/98 courses) (P = NS). Median hospitalization duration and costs were not different. RhG-CSF was 6.6 times more expensive per course than CAB. In conclusion, prophylactic CAB has similar efficacy to rhG-CSF in this setting, and is more cost-effective.
机译:在一项前瞻性随机试验中,接受中期大剂量化疗(环磷酰胺,5-氟尿嘧啶加表柔比星或甲氨蝶呤)的40位IV期乳腺癌患者接受了重组人G-CSF(rhG-CSF,I组)或环丙沙星和两性霉素B的治疗。 (CAB,II组)预防高热性白细胞减少症(FL)。在第一组中,18例患者中有7例发展为FL(在10/108个疗程后)。在第二组中,22名患者中有7名(7/98个疗程)(P = NS)。中位住院时间和费用无差异。每门课程的RhG-CSF费用是CAB的6.6倍。总之,在这种情况下,预防性CAB与rhG-CSF具有相似的功效,并且更具成本效益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号