首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of continuing education in the health professions >Using county-level public health data to prioritize medical education topics.
【24h】

Using county-level public health data to prioritize medical education topics.

机译:使用县级公共卫生数据确定医学教育主题的优先级。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

INTRODUCTION: Medical education topics might be locally prioritized using public health data on health outcomes and risk factors unrelated to quality of care. METHODS: The Missouri Information for Community Assessment (MICA) supplied preventable hospitalization rates (PHRs) for asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes, heart failure, and hypertension in 114 counties from 1998 to 2002. For each disease, a linear regression model predicted PHR from behavior, access, and disease prevalence data from MICA and other public data sources. For each disease in each county, the residual, unexplained PHR should include effects of local medical practices. Variation in relative priority of diseases between counties was estimated from raw PHR and unexplained PHR. RESULTS: The raw values of the five PHRs varied geographically in different patterns. Regression models explained between 46% and 83% of the variability. The medical education priorities implied by unexplained PHR values differ from priorities inferred from unadjusted PHR or disease prevalence. DISCUSSION: Patient behavior and poor health care access contribute to PHR but do not fully explain variation in PHR. If county-level unexplained PHR values identify high priority medical education topics, then other measures of importance, notably disease prevalence and PHR, are poor identifiers of high value topics. Although available predictor and outcome variables constrain the current analysis, unexplained variation in health outcome measures might identify educational opportunities. These observations suggest strategies for balancing and evaluating controlled trials of knowledge dissemination efforts and eventually for deploying educational activities.
机译:简介:医学教育主题可以使用关于健康结果和与护理质量无关的风险因素的公共健康数据,在本地进行优先排序。方法:从1998年到2002年,密苏里州社区评估信息(MICA)提供了114个县的哮喘,慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD),糖尿病,心力衰竭和高血压的可预防住院率(PHR)。对于每种疾病,线性回归模型根据来自MICA和其他公共数据源的行为,访问和疾病流行率数据预测PHR。对于每个县的每种疾病,残留的无法解释的PHR应包括当地医疗实践的影响。从原始PHR和无法解释的PHR估算出县之间疾病相对优先级的差异。结果:五个PHR的原始值在地理上以不同的模式变化。回归模型解释了46%至83%的变异性。无法解释的PHR值所隐含的医学教育优先级与未经调整的PHR或疾病患病率所推断的优先级不同。讨论:患者的行为和较差的医疗保健可导致PHR,但不能完全解释PHR的变化。如果县级无法解释的PHR值确定了高度优先的医学教育主题,则其他重要的衡量指标,尤其是疾病患病率和PHR,是高价值主题的较差标识符。尽管可用的预测变量和结局变量限制了当前的分析,但是无法解释的健康结局指标变化可能会发现受教育的机会。这些观察结果提出了平衡和评估知识传播努力的受控试验并最终用于开展教育活动的策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号