...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of continuing education in the health professions >Identifying educationally influential specialists: issues arising from the use of 'classic' criteria.
【24h】

Identifying educationally influential specialists: issues arising from the use of 'classic' criteria.

机译:确定具有教育影响力的专家:使用“经典”标准引起的问题。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

INTRODUCTION: Educationally influential physicians (EIPs) are identified by their colleagues as people who (1) encourage learning and enjoy sharing their knowledge, (2) are clinical experts and always seem up to date, and (3) treat others as equals. We aimed to identify surgical and pathologist EIPs for colorectal cancer (CRC) in Ontario as part of a blended knowledge transfer program. METHODS: A population-based cohort of surgeons (n = 794) and pathologists (n = 449) were sent surveys modeled on the Hiss method for identifying EIPs. Four formal mailings (including incentives) and telephone calls and faxes were completed. This labor-intensive process identified "general" EIPs and surgery or pathology EIPs for CRC. The characteristics of EIPs in these groups were studied. RESULTS: The response rate was 41% for surgeons and 42% for pathologists. One hundred eighteen general EIPs were identified and substantially more surgical EIPs for CRC (n = 63) than pathology EIPs for CRC (n = 6) were recognized. Forty-two of 81 medical centers in Ontario identified an EIP We also identified a cohort of "domain experts, " physicians whose opinion was valued for CRC but who did not meet the Hiss EIP criteria. This cohort of domain experts surgeons (63 vs. 154) and pathologists (6 vs. 154). DISCUSSION: In this population study, we identified EIPs for CRC using the Hiss method, although significantly more surgical than pathology EIPs for CRC were recognized. The educational influence of domain experts who do not fulfill the Hiss characteristics compared with EIPs for CRC remains to be determined.
机译:简介:具有教育影响力的医师(EIP)被其同事识别为以下人员:(1)鼓励学习并乐于分享他们的知识,(2)是临床专家,并且总是保持最新,并且(3)将其他人平等地对待。我们旨在确定安大略省结直肠癌(CRC)的外科和病理学家EIP,作为混合知识转移计划的一部分。方法:对以人群为基础的外科医生(n = 794)和病理学家(n = 449)进行了调查,这些调查以Hiss方法为模型,用于识别EIP。完成了四次正式邮件(包括奖励)以及电话和传真。此劳动密集型过程确定了CRC的“一般” EIP和手术或病理EIP。研究了这些组中EIP的特征。结果:外科医生的反应率为41%,病理学家的反应率为42%。鉴定出一百一十八个普通EIPs,与CRC病理性EIP(n = 6)相比,CRC的手术EIP(n = 63)要多得多。安大略省81个医疗中心中的42个确定了EIP。我们还确定了一批“领域专家”,这些医生的意见对CRC有重要意义,但不符合Hiss EIP标准。该领域专家外科医生(63对154)和病理学家(6对154)。讨论:在这项人群研究中,尽管我们认识到手术的病理学证据多于病理学的CRC,但我们使用Hiss方法鉴定了CRC的EIP。与EIP相比,不具备Hiss特性的领域专家对于CRC的教育影响仍有待确定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号