首页> 外文期刊>The journal of clinical hypertension. >Combination angiotensin-receptor blocker (ARB)/calcium channel blocker with HCTZ vs the maximal recommended dose of an ARB with HCTZ in patients with stage 2 hypertension: the exforge as compared to losartan treatment in stage 2 systolic hypertension (EXALT) study.
【24h】

Combination angiotensin-receptor blocker (ARB)/calcium channel blocker with HCTZ vs the maximal recommended dose of an ARB with HCTZ in patients with stage 2 hypertension: the exforge as compared to losartan treatment in stage 2 systolic hypertension (EXALT) study.

机译:HCTZ联合血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)/钙通道阻滞剂与HCTZ的最大推荐剂量ARB联合HCTZ:在2期收缩期高血压(EXALT)研究中,与氯沙坦治疗相比,该药具有优势。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study compared the efficacy and safety of combination angiotensin-receptor blocker (ARB)/calcium-channel blocker (CCB) with hydrochlorothiazide (valsartan/amlodipine/HCTZ 160/5/2mg) vs maximal available combination doses of an ARB with HCTZ (losartan/HCTZ 100/25 mg) in the management of stage 2 hypertension. After 1 to 2 weeks of antihypertensive drug washout, patients with a mean sitting systolic blood pressure (MSSBP) of >/= 160 mm Hg and <200 mm Hg were randomized to valsartan/amlodipine 160/5 mg (n = 241) or losartan 100 mg (n = 247). At week 3, HCTZ 25 mg was added to both treatments. The primary end point, reduction in MSSBP from baseline to week 6, was significantly greater in the valsartan/amlodipine group than in the losartan group (least-squares [LS] mean change, -31.8 mm Hg vs -26.4 mm Hg; P<.001). Additional reductions occurred after titrating to 320/10/25 mg at week 6 in the valsartan/amlodipine group and switching from losartan/HCTZ to valsartan/amlodipine/HCTZ (week 6, 160/5/25 mg; week 9, 320/10/25 mg) in the losartan group. Achievement of blood pressure <140/90 mm Hg also favored the valsartan/amlodipine group. Dizziness was the only adverse event reported in >5% of patients (5.4% valsartan/amlodipine group, 3.6% losartan group). Moderate doses of an ARB/CCB combination with HCTZ reduced blood pressure more effectively than the maximal dose of an ARB with HCTZ.
机译:这项研究比较了血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)/钙通道阻滞剂(CCB)与氢氯噻嗪(缬沙坦/氨氯地平/ HCTZ 160/5 / 2mg)的疗效和安全性与ARB与HCTZ(氯沙坦)的最大可用联合剂量的比较/ HCTZ 100/25 mg)治疗2期高血压。经过1至2周的降压药物冲洗后,平均坐位收缩压(MSSBP)> / = 160 mm Hg和<200 mm Hg的患者被随机分配至缬沙坦/氨氯地平160/5 mg(n = 241)或氯沙坦100毫克(n = 247)。在第3周,将HCTZ 25 mg添加至两种处理。缬沙坦/氨氯地平组的主要终点,即从基线到第6周的MSSBP降低明显大于氯沙坦组(均方差[LS],-31.8 mm Hg vs -26.4 mm Hg; P < .001)。在缬沙坦/氨氯地平组在第6周滴定至320/10/25 mg并从氯沙坦/ HCTZ转换为缬沙坦/氨氯地平/ HCTZ后发生了其他减少(第6周,160/5/25 mg;第9周,320/10) / 25毫克)在氯沙坦组中。血压<140/90 mm Hg达到同样也有利于缬沙坦/氨氯地平组。头晕是报道> 5%的患者的唯一不良事件(5.4%的缬沙坦/氨氯地平组,3.6%的氯沙坦组)。与HCTZ的最大剂量相比,中等剂量的HCTZ的ARB / CCB组合可以更有效地降低血压。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号