...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology >Placebo response in asthma: a robust and objective phenomenon.
【24h】

Placebo response in asthma: a robust and objective phenomenon.

机译:哮喘中的安慰剂反应:强烈而客观的现象。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Placebos are hypothesized to exert positive effects on medical conditions by enhancing patient expectancies. Recent reviews suggest that placebo benefits are restricted to subjective responses, like pain, but might be ineffective for objective physiologic outcomes. Nevertheless, mind-body links and placebo responsivity in asthma are widely believed to exist. OBJECTIVE: We carried out a randomized, double-blind investigation to (1) determine whether placebo can suppress airway hyperreactivity in asthmatic subjects, (2) quantify the placebo effect, (3) identify predictors of the placebo response, and (4) determine whether physician interventions modify the placebo response. METHODS: In a double-blind, crossover design investigation, 55 subjects with mild intermittent and persistent asthma with stable airway hyperreactivity were randomized to placebo or salmeterol before serial methacholine challenges. Subjects were additionally randomized to physician interactions that communicated either positive or neutral expectancies regarding drug effect. RESULTS: Placebo bronchodilator administration significantly reduced bronchial hyperreactivity compared with baseline (the calculated concentration of methacholine required to induce a 20% decrease in FEV(1) nearly doubled); 18% of subjects were placebo responders by using conservative definitions. Experimental manipulation of physician behavior altered perceptions of the physician but not the magnitude or frequency of the placebo response. CONCLUSIONS: Objective placebo effects exist in asthma. These responses are of significant magnitude and likely to be meaningful clinically. The placebo response was not modulated by alterations in physician behavior in this study. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The placebo response in patients with asthma is important in understanding the limitations of clinical research studies and in maximizing safe and effective therapies. This article confirms the existence of a strong placebo response in an objective and clinically relevant measure of disease activity.
机译:背景:假设安慰剂可通过增强患者的预期对医疗状况产生积极影响。最近的评论表明,安慰剂的益处仅限于主观反应,例如疼痛,但对客观生理结果可能无效。尽管如此,人们普遍认为哮喘中存在身心联系和安慰剂反应性。目的:我们进行了一项随机,双盲研究,目的是:(1)确定安慰剂是否可以抑制哮喘患者的气道高反应性;(2)量化安慰剂的作用;(3)确定安慰剂反应的预测因子;以及(4)确定医生的干预措施是否会改变安慰剂反应。方法:在一项双盲,交叉设计研究中,将55名轻度间歇性和持续性哮喘伴稳定气道高反应性的受试者随机分为安慰剂组或沙美特罗组,然后再接受甲乙酰胆碱挑战。此外,将受试者随机分配给与医生互动,交流有关药物作用的阳性或中性预期。结果:与基线相比,安慰剂支气管扩张剂的给药显着降低了支气管高反应性(计算得出的引起甲型FEV(1)降低20%所需的乙酰甲胆碱浓度几乎翻了一番);通过保守的定义,有18%的受试者为安慰剂反应者。对医师行为的实验操纵改变了医师的感知,但没有改变安慰剂反应的幅度或频率。结论:哮喘患者存在客观的安慰剂作用。这些反应非常重要,可能在临床上有意义。在这项研究中,安慰剂反应不受医师行为改变的调节。临床意义:哮喘患者的安慰剂反应对于理解临床研究的局限性和最大化安全有效的疗法非常重要。本文证实了在疾病活动的客观和临床相关指标中存在强烈的安慰剂反应。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号