...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology >In vivo assessment with prick-to-prick testing and double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge of allergenicity of apple cultivars.
【24h】

In vivo assessment with prick-to-prick testing and double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge of allergenicity of apple cultivars.

机译:通过点刺试验和苹果品种致敏性的双盲,安慰剂对照食品挑战进行体内评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Apple cultivars have been reported to differ in allergenicity on the basis of in vitro and skin prick tests with apple extracts. OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate the efficacy of the prick-to-prick method in assessing differences in allergenicity of apple cultivars and to confirm differences by means of double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC). METHODS: Intra-assay and intracultivar variation of prick-to-prick test results were determined in 6 Dutch and 8 Spanish patients with apple allergy by using 5 apples of the cultivars Golden Delicious, Fuji, and Ecolette in duplicate. In addition, 21 cultivars were screened for allergenicity in 15 Dutch patients with birch pollen and apple allergy. Two selected cultivars (Golden Delicious and Santana) were tested with DBPCFCs. The influence of storage conditions on allergenicity was assessed in 5 cultivars. RESULTS: Intra-assay variation of skin prick testing was 3.9%, and intracultivar variation was 4.1%. A ranking of 21 cultivars was made on the basis of prick-to-prick tests in 9 patients. Apple cultivars were classified as of low, intermediate, and high allergenicity, with a significant difference between low and high allergenicity (P < .001). A significant difference in allergenicity determined between Golden Delicious and Santana cultivars (P < .05) was confirmed by means of DBPCFC. With 5 cultivars, controlled atmosphere (2.5% oxygen/1% carbon dioxide) was shown to reduce allergenicity (P < .001) by 15% compared with storage at 2 degrees C. CONCLUSIONS: Prick-to-prick testing with fresh apples is a reproducible method of assessing allergenicity. Apples can be classified as of low or high allergenicity for the majority of patients. This was confirmed by using DBPCFCs. Selection of cultivars and control of storage conditions are both viable strategies for reduction of symptoms in patients with apple allergy.
机译:背景:据报道,在对苹果提取物进行体外和皮肤点刺试验的基础上,苹果品种的致敏性有所不同。目的:我们试图评估点刺法在评估苹果变种的致敏性差异方面的功效,并通过双盲,安慰剂对照食物激发(DBPCFC)来确认差异。方法:一式两份地使用5个苹果品种Golden Golden,Fuji和Ecolette对6个荷兰和8个西班牙过敏苹果患者进行了点滴试验结果的测定内和品种间变异。此外,在15名荷兰桦树花粉和苹果过敏患者中筛选了21个品种的致敏性。使用DBPCFC对两个选定的品种(Golden Delicious和Santana)进行了测试。在5个品种中评估了储存条件对变应原性的影响。结果:皮肤点刺试验的批内变异率为3.9%,品种内变异为4.1%。根据9个患者的点刺试验对21个品种进行了排名。苹果品种分为低,中和高致敏性,低和高致敏性之间有显着差异(P <.001)。通过DBPCFC证实了Golden Delicious和Santana品种之间的致敏性显着差异(P <.05)。与在2°C下储存相比,在5个品种下,控制气氛(2.5%氧气/ 1%二氧化碳)显示出降低了15%的致敏性(P <.001)。结论:用新鲜苹果进行点刺试验是一种可重复的评估变应原性的方法。对于大多数患者而言,苹果可分为低或高致敏性。通过使用DBPCFC确认了这一点。选择品种和控制贮藏条件都是减轻苹果过敏患者症状的可行策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号