...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology >Qualitative research-enhanced understanding of patients' beliefs: results of focus groups with low-income, urban, African American adults with asthma.
【24h】

Qualitative research-enhanced understanding of patients' beliefs: results of focus groups with low-income, urban, African American adults with asthma.

机译:通过定性研究增强对患者信念的理解:低收入,城市,非洲裔美国人患有哮喘的焦点小组的研究结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Qualitative research is an important research methodology for understanding the health beliefs and attitudes of patients. These beliefs and attitudes have been proposed as partial explanations for low adherence to medical therapy and the consequent high burden of morbidity from asthma among low-income urban minorities. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to explore barriers to adherence to inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs), health beliefs regarding asthma and its treatment, and opinions about providers and clinical research among low-income groups. METHODS: Three focus groups were conducted with 15 low-income, urban, African American adults with persistent asthma. These focus group sessions were audiotaped, transcribed verbatim, and coded by using qualitative analytic techniques. RESULTS: Health beliefs that influenced adherence included patients' reliance on their assessment of asthma control over that of the health provider and concern over the adverse effects of ICS therapy. Adherence was also adversely affected by social obligations and insurers' approval policies and restricted formularies. Although mistrust of the medical establishment was evident, members generally expressed a willingness to participate in nonpharmacologic clinical research and the belief that research was beneficial. However, they had strong preferences for where the research should be conducted. CONCLUSIONS: Although barriers exist to ICS adherence in patient populations, many of these can be addressed during patient-clinician interactions. Qualitative research is an important tool for formulating hypotheses for improving ICS adherence that can then be tested in the future by using quantitative research methods.
机译:背景:定性研究是了解患者健康信念和态度的重要研究方法。这些信念和态度已被提出,部分解释了低收入城市少数族裔对药物治疗的依从性差以及哮喘病的高负担。目的:本研究的目的是探讨对吸入性糖皮质激素(ICSs)依从性的障碍,有关哮喘及其治疗的健康观念以及低收入人群对提供者和临床研究的看法。方法:对15个低收入,城市,非洲裔美国人持续哮喘患者进行了三个焦点小组讨论。对这些焦点小组会议进行了录音,逐字记录,并使用定性分析技术进行了编码。结果:影响依从性的健康观念包括患者对他们的哮喘控制评估(对健康提供者的评估)以及对ICS治疗的不良影响的担忧。遵守也受到社会义务,保险公司批准政策和限制性规定的不利影响。尽管对医疗机构的不信任感很明显,但成员们普遍表示愿意参加非药物临床研究,并相信研究是有益的。但是,他们对应该在哪里进行研究有强烈的偏好。结论:尽管患者人群中存在ICS依从性的障碍,但在患者与临床医生的互动中可以解决许多障碍。定性研究是制定假设以提高ICS依从性的重要工具,以后可以使用定量研究方法进行检验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号