首页> 外文期刊>The journal of adhesive dentistry >Effect of resin cements and aging on cuspal deflection and fracture resistance of teeth restored with composite resin inlays.
【24h】

Effect of resin cements and aging on cuspal deflection and fracture resistance of teeth restored with composite resin inlays.

机译:树脂胶合剂和时效对复合树脂镶嵌物修复的牙齿的骨变形和抗断裂性的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

To evaluate the influence of resin cements and aging on cuspal deflection, fracture resistance, and mode of failure of endodontically treated teeth restored with composite resin inlays.Seventy-two maxillary premolars were divided into 6 groups: 1: sound teeth as control (C); 2: preparations without restoration (WR); 3: inlays luted with RelyX ARC (ARC); 4: inlays luted with RelyX Unicem (RLXU); 5: inlays luted with Maxcem Elite (MCE); 6: inlays luted with SeT (ST). Groups 2 to 6 received mesio-occlusal-distal preparations and endodontic treatment. Stone casts were made for groups 3 to 6. Composite resin inlays were built over each cast and luted with the resin cements. A 200-N load was applied on the occlusal aspect and the cuspal deflection was measured using a micrometer before and after 500,000 cycles of fatigue loading (200 N; 500,000 cycles). The specimens were then submitted to an axial load until failure.The median cuspal deflection (μm) and median fracture resistance (N) were calculated and statistically analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests (p < 0.01). Values followed by the same letter represent no statistically significant difference. Cuspal deflection before cyclic loading: C = 3 μma; ARC = 4 μmab; RLXU= 5 μmab; MCE = 21 μmb; ST = 51 μmbc; WR = 69 μmc. Cuspal deflection after cyclic loading: ARC = 6 μma; RLXU = 19 μmab; MCE = 33 μmb; ST = 62 μmb. Fracture resistance in N: C = 1902a; ARC = 980b; RLXU = 670c; MCE = 533c; ST = 601c; WR = 526c. According to the Wilcoxon test, there was no statistical difference between the cuspal deflection before and after cyclic loading only for ARC (p = 0.015). There was a predominance of recovery fractures for the restored groups.Composite resin inlays luted with RelyX ARC maintained cuspal deflection stability and showed higher fracture resistance of the teeth than did inlays luted with the other cements tested.
机译:为了评估树脂胶结剂和老化对复合树脂嵌体修复的牙髓治疗,牙髓变形,抗断裂性和失败模式的影响。将72颗上颌前磨牙分为6组:1:健齿作为对照(C) ; 2:未恢复的准备(WR); 3:嵌体被RelyX ARC(ARC)吸引; 4:嵌体被RelyX Unicem(RLXU)吸引; 5:用Maxcem Elite(MCE)诱惑的镶嵌物; 6:镶嵌物被SeT(ST)吸引。 2至6组接受近中颌远侧准备和牙髓治疗。为第3组至第6组制作了石铸件。在每个铸件上建有复合树脂嵌体,并用树脂胶粘剂浇铸。在咬合面施加200 N的载荷,并在疲劳载荷的500,000循环(200 N; 500,000循环)之前和之后使用千分尺测量骨挠度。然后将样品承受轴向载荷直至失效。使用Kruskal-Wallis和Mann-Whitney检验计算并统计分析中位骨挠度(μm)和中位抗折强度(N)(p <0.01)。值后跟相同的字母表示没有统计学上的显着差异。循环载荷之前的s骨挠度:C = 3μma; ARC = 4μmab; RLXU = 5μmab; MCE = 21μmb; ST = 51μmbc; WR = 69μmc。循环载荷后骨挠度:ARC = 6μma; RLXU = 19μmab; MCE = 33μmb; ST = 62μmb。 N的抗断裂强度:C = 1902a; ARC = 980b; RLXU = 670c; MCE = 533c; ST = 601c; WR = 526c。根据Wilcoxon检验,仅对于ARC,在周期性加载前后的骨挠度之间没有统计学差异(p = 0.015)。修复组的恢复骨折占多数。与RelyX ARC粘合的复合树脂镶嵌物相比,与其他测试的水泥粘合的镶嵌物保持了cus骨偏转稳定性并显示出更高的牙齿抗断裂性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号