...
首页> 外文期刊>The journal of adhesive dentistry >Microleakeage and resin cement film thickness of luted all-ceramic and gold electroformed porcelain-fused-to-metal crowns.
【24h】

Microleakeage and resin cement film thickness of luted all-ceramic and gold electroformed porcelain-fused-to-metal crowns.

机译:全陶瓷和金电铸瓷熔金属冠的微渗漏和树脂胶结膜厚度。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the sealing ability of single-unit all-ceramic and gold-electroformed crowns luted with a resin cement under laboratory conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty extracted maxillary premolars were selected. Standardized abutments were prepared for full-crown restorations with cervical margins located 1 mm below the cementoenamel junction. Samples were divided into two groups (n = 15) based on type of restorative system: Group 1: a heat-pressed all-ceramic system (IPS Empress 2, Ivoclar-Vivadent); Group 2: a gold-electroformed porcelain-fused-to-metal system (Gramm Technik). Crowns were luted with Excite DSC bonding system (Ivoclar-Vivadent) and Variolink II resin cement (Ivoclar-Vivadent) following manufacturer's instructions. After luting procedures and 700 thermal cycles (5 degrees C and 55 degrees C, 1 min dwell time), 20 specimens (n = 10 per group) were randomly selected and processed for microleakage evaluation at cervical sites. The remaining specimens (n = 5 per group) were prepared for SEM investigation on film thickness. Microleakage and film thickness data were statistically evaluated using the Mann-Whitney U-test (p < 0.05). RESULTS: Fifty percent of group 1 and 60% of group 2 samples showed leakage. For group 1, dye penetration was mostly observed between metal and resin material, while group 2 specimens showed leakage mainly between ceramic margins and resin cement. Samples from group 1 showed a cement thickness of 82 microm, while 71 microm was found for group 2. Statistically significant differences were not found between samples from the two groups. CONCLUSION: Regarding microleakage and film thickness, both restorative systems evaluated in this study performed similarly.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是评估在实验室条件下用树脂胶粘剂浸润的单个全瓷和金电铸冠的密封能力。材料与方法:选择30颗上颌前磨牙。为全冠修复体准备了标准化基台,其子宫颈边缘位于牙骨质釉质连接处下方1毫米处。根据修复系统的类型,将样品分为两组(n = 15):组1:热压全陶瓷系统(IPS Empress 2,Ivoclar-Vivadent);第2组:金电铸瓷熔金属系统(Gramm Technik)。根据制造商的说明,使用Excite DSC粘结系统(Ivoclar-Vivadent)和Variolink II树脂胶粘剂(Ivoclar-Vivadent)冲洗牙冠。经过诱饵程序和700个热循环(5摄氏度和55摄氏度,停留时间1分钟)后,随机选择20个样本(每组n = 10)并进行处理,以在宫颈部位进行微渗漏评估。其余样品(每组n = 5)准备用于SEM的膜厚研究。使用Mann-Whitney U检验统计评估微渗漏和膜厚数据(p <0.05)。结果:第一组的50%和第二组的60%的样品出现渗漏。对于第1组,大多数在金属和树脂材料之间观察到染料渗透,而第2组样品则主要在陶瓷边缘和树脂水泥之间渗漏。第一组的样品显示水泥厚度为82微米,而第二组的水泥厚度为71微米。两组之间在统计学上没有显着差异。结论:关于微渗漏和膜厚度,本研究中评估的两种修复系统的表现均相似。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号