首页> 外文期刊>The International journal of drug policy >Governing drug use through partnerships: Towards a genealogy of governmenton-government relations in drug policy
【24h】

Governing drug use through partnerships: Towards a genealogy of governmenton-government relations in drug policy

机译:通过伙伴关系管理毒品使用:探讨毒品政策中政府/非政府关系的系谱

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Drug policy in Australia is underpinned by the idea of partnerships wherein the non-government sector is one important partner in both delivering services and contributing to policy and decision-making processes. This article presents a genealogy of the concept of governmenton-government 'partnerships', tracing its emergence and development within drug policy discourse in Australia. We find that the rise of neo-liberal policies since the 1980s has been a key factor facilitating the emergence of governmenton-government 'partnerships' rhetoric in drug policy. Since the 1980s, the role of non government organisations (NGOs) in drug policy has been articulated in relation to 'community' responsibilisation in contrast to the welfarist reliance on expert intervention. We link the rise of this rhetoric with the neo-liberal turn to governing through community and the individualisation of social problems. Furthermore, although we find that governments on the whole have encouraged the service delivery and policy work of NGOs at least in policy rhetoric, the actions of the state have at times limited the ability of NGOs to perform advocacy work and contribute to policy. Constraints on NGO drug policy work could potentially compromise the responsiveness of drug policy systems by limiting opportunities for innovative policy-making and service delivery. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:澳大利亚的毒品政策以伙伴关系的思想为基础,其中,非政府部门是提供服务以及为政策和决策过程做出贡献的重要伙伴。本文介绍了政府/非政府“伙伴关系”概念的系谱,追溯了其在澳大利亚毒品政策话语中的出现和发展。我们发现,自1980年代以来,新自由主义政策的兴起一直是促进政府/非政府“伙伴关系”言论在毒品政策中兴起的关键因素。自1980年代以来,非政府组织(NGOs)在毒品政策中的作用已明确地表达为“社区”责任制,而不是福利主义者对专家干预的依赖。我们将这种言论与新自由主义的兴起联系起来,通过社区和社会问题的个体化来进行治理。此外,尽管我们发现,总体上来说,政府至少在政策方面鼓励了非政府组织的服务提供和政策工作,但国家的行动有时限制了非政府组织开展宣传工作和为政策做出贡献的能力。非政府组织毒品政策工作的限制可能会通过限制创新性政策制定和服务提供的机会而潜在地损害毒品政策系统的响应能力。 (C)2015 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号