首页> 外文期刊>The International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology >Contrasting visions of food and farming sustainability: NGOs versus the UK Labour government
【24h】

Contrasting visions of food and farming sustainability: NGOs versus the UK Labour government

机译:粮食和农业可持续发展的不同愿景:非政府组织与英国工党政府的对抗

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In a previous issue of the International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology I described how competing visions of sustainable agriculture are currently battling for hegemonic status (Johnson 2006). One vision seeks to break the hegemony of productionism and the other seeks to continue down its path with a greater emphasis on biotechnology. In this paper, I wish to explore these visions further as they apply to actual existing strategies for sustainable farming and food in the UK This paper uses discourse analysis to compare the UK government's vision for sustainable farming and food sectors with that of two NGOs: Friends of the Earth and Corporate Watch. The language and discourse in the government's and NGOs' strategy documents is examined for evidence indicating their ideological conception of agricultural sustainability. The paper concludes that, whilst the NGOs are pursuing a strong vision of sustainability, seeking to break productionism's hegemony, the UK government is pursuing an ideologically weak-to-moderate conceptualisation of sustainability, pursuing the high-technology modified version of agricultural productionism.
机译:在《国际可持续发展与世界生态杂志》的上一期中,我描述了可持续农业的竞争观目前正在争夺霸权地位(Johnson 2006)。一种设想力图打破生产主义的霸权,而另一种力图继续走下去,更加重视生物技术。在本文中,我希望进一步探讨这些远景,因为它们适用于英国现有的可持续农业和粮食实际策略。本文使用话语分析来比较英国政府对可持续农业和粮食部门的愿景与两个非政府组织的看法:地球和企业观察。对政府和非政府组织战略文件中的语言和论述进行了审查,以寻找表明其农业可持续性意识形态观念的证据。该论文的结论是,尽管非政府组织追求可持续发展的强烈愿景,力图打破生产主义的霸权,但英国政府仍在追求意识形态上从弱到中等的可持续性概念,追求农业生产主义的高科技改良版。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号