...
首页> 外文期刊>The British Journal of Nutrition >Glycaemic index: did Health Canada get it wrong? Position from the International Carbohydrate Quality Consortium (ICQC).Comments Comment on: Am J Clin Nutr. 2013 Aug;98(2):269-74; PMID: 23761481
【24h】

Glycaemic index: did Health Canada get it wrong? Position from the International Carbohydrate Quality Consortium (ICQC).Comments Comment on: Am J Clin Nutr. 2013 Aug;98(2):269-74; PMID: 23761481

机译:血糖指数:加拿大卫生部是否弄错了?国际碳水化合物质量协会(ICQC)的立场。评论评论:Am J Clin Nutr。 2013年8月; 98(2):269-74; PMID:23761481

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

On behalf of Health Canada, Aziz et al. (1) recently published their evaluation of the use of glycaemic index (GI) claims on food labels. Although the importance of controlling postprandial glycaemia (PPG) was recognised in the position statement, they expressed the view that the GI could be ‘misleading’ and ‘would not add value’ to the existing standards for nutrition labels. Unfortunately, several statements indicate a lack of understanding of the evidence base for current information on food labels and of the GI concept in particular.
机译:Aziz等人代表加拿大卫生部。 (1)最近发表了他们对食品标签上使用血糖指数(GI)声明的评估。尽管立场声明中承认控制餐后血糖(PPG)的重要性,但他们认为GI可能会“误导”并且不会为现有营养标签标准“增值”。不幸的是,有几项陈述表明对食品标签的当前信息尤其是地理标志概念的证据基础缺乏了解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号