...
首页> 外文期刊>The British Journal of Nutrition >Whole-grain dietary recommendations: the need for a unified global approach
【24h】

Whole-grain dietary recommendations: the need for a unified global approach

机译:全谷物饮食建议:需要统一的全球方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Increased whole-grain (WG) consumption reduces the risk of CVD, type 2 diabetes and some cancers, is related to reduced body weight and weight gain and is related to improved intestinal health. Definitions of 'WG' and 'WG food' are proposed and used in some countries but are not consistent. Many countries promote WG consumption, but the emphasis given and the messages used vary. We surveyed dietary recommendations of fifty-three countries for mentions of WG to assess the extent, rationale and diversity in emphasis and wording of any recommendations. If present, recommendations were classified as either 'primary', where the recommendation was specific for WG, or 'secondary', where recommendations were made in order to achieve another (primary) target, most often dietary fibre intake. In total, 127 organisations were screened, including government, non-governmental organisations, charities and professional bodies, the WHO and European Food Safety Authority, of which forty-nine including WHO provide a WG intake recommendation. Recommendations ranged from 'specific' with specified target amounts (e.g. xg WG/d), 'semi-quantitative' where intake was linked to intake of cereal/carbohydrate foods with proportions of WG suggested (e.g. x servings of cereals of which y servings should be WG) to 'non-specific' based on 'eating more' WG or 'choosing WG where possible'. This lack of a harmonised message may result in confusion for the consumer, lessen the impact of public health messages and pose barriers to trade in the food industry. A science-based consensus or expert opinion on WG recommendations is needed, with a global reach to guide public health decision making and increase WG consumption globally.
机译:增加全麦(WG)消耗量可降低CVD,2型糖尿病和某些癌症的风险,这与体重减轻和体重增加有关,并且与改善肠道健康有关。在某些国家提出并使用了“ WG”和“ WG食品”的定义,但定义不一致。许多国家/地区促进了工作组的消费,但是重点和使用的信息各不相同。我们对53个国家的饮食建议进行了调查,以提及工作组,以评估建议的重点和措辞的程度,原理和多样性。如果存在建议,则将建议分为“主要”建议(针对WG)或“次要”建议,以实现另一个(主要)目标,通常是膳食纤维摄入量。总共筛选了127个组织,包括政府,非政府组织,慈善机构和专业机构,WHO和欧洲食品安全局,其中包括WHO在内的49个组织提供了WG摄入建议。建议的范围从“特定”到指定的目标量(例如xg WG / d),“半定量”,其中摄入量与建议的WG比例与谷物/碳水化合物食品的摄入量相关(例如,x份谷物应y份) WG)改为“非特定”,基于“多吃” WG或“在可能的情况下选择WG”。缺乏统一的信息可能会导致消费者感到困惑,减少公共卫生信息的影响,并给食品行业的贸易造成障碍。需要针对工作组建议的基于科学的共识或专家意见,并在全球范围内指导公共卫生决策制定并在全球范围内增加工作组的消费。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号